Why would anybody believe this? The fact that the guy is trying to make a name/career for himself is hardly in question. Is this normal journalistic behavior, to quote from unseen sources so much? Or is it just exploiting people's confirmation bias? I see he changed his avatar from the golden Star of David.
I believe David Seaman is telling the truth. Yes it is normal to quote from unseen source. For security purposes, journalists cannot always provide their sources. Just think of Wikileaks, they don't provide their sources, but what they leak has always been proven true.
As for David Seaman, it's anybody's guess. I believe him, others may not. Only time will tell.
And I can see quoting from secret sources as in a supplementary way, but to make it the crux of their reporting is just retarded. It really reeks of someone making things up. This guy is making youtube videos from his living room. And he has secret insider government sources? Nah, let's not question that.
Sure, it is a possibility. And the fact that you are questionning this is perfectly ok. However I don't understand why it would be so absurd that a guy making videos from his living room could have insider government sources. What is the logic here? Steve Pieczenik gave interviews recently where he appears to be in his living room. So what?
Anyway I think he is telling the truth, but I could be wrong.
And I take what Steve Pieczenik says and anybody like him with a grain of salt. If it proves true, great. But there are disinfo agents working and many of them are featured on Alex Jones. I do think Seaman is trying to position himself at that level in the Alt-media. Like the new Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson. He should break into Bohemian Grove and film if it he wants to do that.
And... he was fired. He seems rather desperate and crazed to get another job again. Not sure this is going to do it for him.
Since when was cheerleading a point of honor in the alt-Media? We already have Alex Jones, and most everyone with any sense knows he's not to be trusted.
Yea... he was fired when he wrote about Hillarys health and ate a gigantic red pill. Wtf is your point in this?
Let's say for the sake of argument he is only doing this for a paycheck (when there are far simpler topics to tackle that doesn't draw deep state heat rounds), does his work by contribute towards the ultimate SHARED goal of justice? The more I read from you, the more I sense that justice is not your underlying intent, but that's my personal perspective.
Do you think this is the path of least resistance for him?
view the rest of the comments →
SlackeryTurnBull ago
Why would anybody believe this? The fact that the guy is trying to make a name/career for himself is hardly in question. Is this normal journalistic behavior, to quote from unseen sources so much? Or is it just exploiting people's confirmation bias? I see he changed his avatar from the golden Star of David.
newworldahead ago
I believe David Seaman is telling the truth. Yes it is normal to quote from unseen source. For security purposes, journalists cannot always provide their sources. Just think of Wikileaks, they don't provide their sources, but what they leak has always been proven true.
As for David Seaman, it's anybody's guess. I believe him, others may not. Only time will tell.
SlackeryTurnBull ago
Wikileaks had to authenticate those emails.
And I can see quoting from secret sources as in a supplementary way, but to make it the crux of their reporting is just retarded. It really reeks of someone making things up. This guy is making youtube videos from his living room. And he has secret insider government sources? Nah, let's not question that.
newworldahead ago
Sure, it is a possibility. And the fact that you are questionning this is perfectly ok. However I don't understand why it would be so absurd that a guy making videos from his living room could have insider government sources. What is the logic here? Steve Pieczenik gave interviews recently where he appears to be in his living room. So what?
Anyway I think he is telling the truth, but I could be wrong.
SlackeryTurnBull ago
And I take what Steve Pieczenik says and anybody like him with a grain of salt. If it proves true, great. But there are disinfo agents working and many of them are featured on Alex Jones. I do think Seaman is trying to position himself at that level in the Alt-media. Like the new Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson. He should break into Bohemian Grove and film if it he wants to do that.
tehthu ago
You do realize he was a paid journalist for huffington post for a number of years? He's not just some dude in his living room.
Do your own homework. Seaman has been a galvanizing force this whole time and received the brunt of slings and arrows for carrying this torch.
SlackeryTurnBull ago
And... he was fired. He seems rather desperate and crazed to get another job again. Not sure this is going to do it for him.
Since when was cheerleading a point of honor in the alt-Media? We already have Alex Jones, and most everyone with any sense knows he's not to be trusted.
tehthu ago
Yea... he was fired when he wrote about Hillarys health and ate a gigantic red pill. Wtf is your point in this?
Let's say for the sake of argument he is only doing this for a paycheck (when there are far simpler topics to tackle that doesn't draw deep state heat rounds), does his work by contribute towards the ultimate SHARED goal of justice? The more I read from you, the more I sense that justice is not your underlying intent, but that's my personal perspective.
Do you think this is the path of least resistance for him?
h2d ago
Dude is a troll. Don't waste your time anymore it's clear he has ulterior motives after looking over his post history.