You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

SlackeryTurnBull ago

Why would anybody believe this? The fact that the guy is trying to make a name/career for himself is hardly in question. Is this normal journalistic behavior, to quote from unseen sources so much? Or is it just exploiting people's confirmation bias? I see he changed his avatar from the golden Star of David.

newworldahead ago

I believe David Seaman is telling the truth. Yes it is normal to quote from unseen source. For security purposes, journalists cannot always provide their sources. Just think of Wikileaks, they don't provide their sources, but what they leak has always been proven true.

As for David Seaman, it's anybody's guess. I believe him, others may not. Only time will tell.

SlackeryTurnBull ago

Wikileaks had to authenticate those emails.

And I can see quoting from secret sources as in a supplementary way, but to make it the crux of their reporting is just retarded. It really reeks of someone making things up. This guy is making youtube videos from his living room. And he has secret insider government sources? Nah, let's not question that.

HashTagFU ago

You I like. Don't forget (((Seaman))) or is it (((Semen)))?