Ben Swann should do an expose about the COVERAGE that ensued from his video clip, which simply asked why is no one asking these questions and investigating? It is some of the best evidence out there:
* Why did the video on the CBS site get taken down within 24 hours? If it were a temporary issue, that could be explained, but it has been down for at least 15 hours now. These kinds of issues are very easy to fix, especially when the public notifies them, so this is clearly deliberate.
* The media hit pieces just scream louder that there is a media blackout on this issue. He cannot even point out the tip of the iceberg and the fact that this has not been investigated by the media or by the police without being vilified. The DC Police even lied, claiming that they had completed an investigation when they had not (revealed by a FOIA request https://www.intellihub.com/foia-dc-police-never-actually-investigated-pizzagate/)). That fact alone makes this worthy of further pursuit.
* Someone who reads at the fourth-grade level could understand that the "articles" debunking pizzagate have done nothing to address the real evidence. The process started with a smear piece by the NY Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/technology/fact-check-this-pizzeria-is-not-a-child-trafficking-site.html)), claiming pizzagate to be "fake news" but debunking nothing. This became the de-facto basis for all others in the echo chamber to dismiss. If you have not already, it is worth reading this piece to see that it involved zero investigation or effort to get to the truth. The article makes this false claim, among others:
[Mr. Alefantis] found dozens of made-up articles about Mrs. Clinton kidnapping, molesting and trafficking children in the restaurant’s back rooms."
It never cites such articles as they do not exist. No one has made such a literal assertion anywhere. The discussion involves the broader connection and operations but not Hillary herself snatching kids to molest. This intentional red herring makes it easy for the reader to dismiss the entire pedogate investigation outright as lunacy. Without addressing a SINGLE piece of evidence that we have compiled that this must be investigated...email communications, pedo logos, extremely disturbing instagram photos/artwork of young children AND suspicious comments, obvious pedo imagery in the Buck's 10th-Birthday Promotion, the massive highly-encrypted files (must be video) discovered behind a password-protected section of the CPP website (https://www.cometpingpong.com/protected)...the...the) hit piece proceeds to simply brush off the story with this entirely unsubstantiated claim:
None of it was true. While Mr. Alefantis has some prominent Democratic friends in Washington and was a supporter of Mrs. Clinton, he has never met her, does not sell or abuse children, and is not being investigated by law enforcement for any of these claims. He and his 40 employees had unwittingly become real people caught in the middle of a storm of fake news.
Done. A key target of this sordid story claims that this is not true, so it must not be true. Since they have now successfully labeled pizzagate as "fake news" and thoroughly debunked it [actually, did not even try], all other media can now report in the same way. "It is 'fake news' that has already been debunked." "It was investigated and nothing was found."
Why is Twitter shadowbanning references to pizzagate and related tweets...even banning some who are trying to share information?
Why is youtube altering view counts or exposure of pizzagate-related videos, even banning some such videos and users?
Why is google doing the same, altering native search results in favor of those portraying pizzagate as "fake news" at the expense of higher-trafficked sites that are actually investigating this?
Why did Reddit ban the entire pizzagate subreddit without any substantiated explanation? They claimed doxxing, but there was no such evidence. Their unsubstantiated claim was the "fake news" in that story.
Why are payment mechanisms, such as PayPal, targeting and harassing high-profile pizzagate advocates such as David Seaman?
Why are there historically so many suspicious deaths (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1530490)) of people who investigate elite-pedo crimes, including several related to this actual investigation?
It would be great to build an actual list of all the evidence of a cover up as this will help open the minds of those who have been fed the "fake news" lie by the MSM and TPTB.
view the rest of the comments →
reasonedandinformed ago
Ben Swann should do an expose about the COVERAGE that ensued from his video clip, which simply asked why is no one asking these questions and investigating? It is some of the best evidence out there: * Why did the video on the CBS site get taken down within 24 hours? If it were a temporary issue, that could be explained, but it has been down for at least 15 hours now. These kinds of issues are very easy to fix, especially when the public notifies them, so this is clearly deliberate. * The media hit pieces just scream louder that there is a media blackout on this issue. He cannot even point out the tip of the iceberg and the fact that this has not been investigated by the media or by the police without being vilified. The DC Police even lied, claiming that they had completed an investigation when they had not (revealed by a FOIA request https://www.intellihub.com/foia-dc-police-never-actually-investigated-pizzagate/)). That fact alone makes this worthy of further pursuit. * Someone who reads at the fourth-grade level could understand that the "articles" debunking pizzagate have done nothing to address the real evidence. The process started with a smear piece by the NY Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/21/technology/fact-check-this-pizzeria-is-not-a-child-trafficking-site.html)), claiming pizzagate to be "fake news" but debunking nothing. This became the de-facto basis for all others in the echo chamber to dismiss. If you have not already, it is worth reading this piece to see that it involved zero investigation or effort to get to the truth. The article makes this false claim, among others:
It never cites such articles as they do not exist. No one has made such a literal assertion anywhere. The discussion involves the broader connection and operations but not Hillary herself snatching kids to molest. This intentional red herring makes it easy for the reader to dismiss the entire pedogate investigation outright as lunacy. Without addressing a SINGLE piece of evidence that we have compiled that this must be investigated...email communications, pedo logos, extremely disturbing instagram photos/artwork of young children AND suspicious comments, obvious pedo imagery in the Buck's 10th-Birthday Promotion, the massive highly-encrypted files (must be video) discovered behind a password-protected section of the CPP website (https://www.cometpingpong.com/protected)...the...the) hit piece proceeds to simply brush off the story with this entirely unsubstantiated claim:
Done. A key target of this sordid story claims that this is not true, so it must not be true. Since they have now successfully labeled pizzagate as "fake news" and thoroughly debunked it [actually, did not even try], all other media can now report in the same way. "It is 'fake news' that has already been debunked." "It was investigated and nothing was found."
It would be great to build an actual list of all the evidence of a cover up as this will help open the minds of those who have been fed the "fake news" lie by the MSM and TPTB.
Bolux ago
Great post