I didn't read this, so my complaint my be invalid, but it seems like that fallacy think about not being able to prove that something doesn't exist. You can prove what does exist and do that a bunch until you've got a pretty good idea of what doesn't exist, but you can't really prove that somewhere out of sight, things aren't different and that the thing for sure doesn't exist there. It's possible to prove allegations, but without hard proof of the allegations, how do you prove that they aren't just eccentrics who are innocent of the allegations, although not innocent of being eccentric, which generally isn't illegal? Anyway, despite the difficulty, I hope the truth does get proven. Well, if the truth is that they're harming people, I hope that gets proven. And if they're innocent of harming anyone and proving that they'le innocent is possible without destroying them, I hope that happens, but if they're innocent of harming anyone and "proving" the negative would destroy their lives, then I actually hope it doesn't get proven, because I wouldn't want my life ruined over false allegations just because I may be innocently different than normies in private.
Well since you didn't read this that explains why you misunderstand it. I guess I'll take my own time to explain it to you since you yourself were too lazy to find out for yourself, which then begs the question why are you here and why would you spend so much time making a long comment when you didn't want to spend the actual time to RTA. So what they say that they will do is pay you 25,000 dollars cold hard cash, if you can debunk ANY OF THE CLAIMS MADE ON THE WEBSITE. So if you can prove that John podesta didn't send the emails, you get the money, if you can prove jimmycomet never posted any instagram photos then you get 25k... there are plenty of claims there so go for it, but they are also all very solid claims so doubt anyone is collecting it any time soon. I wonder how many child slaves 25k buys...
Sorry -- it doesn't say ANY it says EVERY -- which is probably impossible, Reading is not much help if you don't see the big difference between any and every.
Certainly big difference, surely it's a ploy to throw a big number out and get attention. But it is attention needed and considering the underhanded tactics we have seen used against the research it seems legal to me, it's asking for the information to be proven wrong. I do like the previous suggestion that they remove any bias in the lower parts
view the rest of the comments →
varialus ago
I didn't read this, so my complaint my be invalid, but it seems like that fallacy think about not being able to prove that something doesn't exist. You can prove what does exist and do that a bunch until you've got a pretty good idea of what doesn't exist, but you can't really prove that somewhere out of sight, things aren't different and that the thing for sure doesn't exist there. It's possible to prove allegations, but without hard proof of the allegations, how do you prove that they aren't just eccentrics who are innocent of the allegations, although not innocent of being eccentric, which generally isn't illegal? Anyway, despite the difficulty, I hope the truth does get proven. Well, if the truth is that they're harming people, I hope that gets proven. And if they're innocent of harming anyone and proving that they'le innocent is possible without destroying them, I hope that happens, but if they're innocent of harming anyone and "proving" the negative would destroy their lives, then I actually hope it doesn't get proven, because I wouldn't want my life ruined over false allegations just because I may be innocently different than normies in private.
Fateswebb ago
Well since you didn't read this that explains why you misunderstand it. I guess I'll take my own time to explain it to you since you yourself were too lazy to find out for yourself, which then begs the question why are you here and why would you spend so much time making a long comment when you didn't want to spend the actual time to RTA. So what they say that they will do is pay you 25,000 dollars cold hard cash, if you can debunk ANY OF THE CLAIMS MADE ON THE WEBSITE. So if you can prove that John podesta didn't send the emails, you get the money, if you can prove jimmycomet never posted any instagram photos then you get 25k... there are plenty of claims there so go for it, but they are also all very solid claims so doubt anyone is collecting it any time soon. I wonder how many child slaves 25k buys...
Astrodreamer ago
Sorry -- it doesn't say ANY it says EVERY -- which is probably impossible, Reading is not much help if you don't see the big difference between any and every.
Fateswebb ago
Certainly big difference, surely it's a ploy to throw a big number out and get attention. But it is attention needed and considering the underhanded tactics we have seen used against the research it seems legal to me, it's asking for the information to be proven wrong. I do like the previous suggestion that they remove any bias in the lower parts