You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Votescam ago

James O'Keefe PPH videos -- like his other videos -- were heavily edited to lie about what was going on. Are perhaps these tapes also edited?

Fateswebb ago

He released the unedited videos..

Votescam ago

His PPH videos have been debunked He had, as I recall it more than 15 hours of videos and he reduced it to a few minutes. Again, the Republicans (including McConnell) had approved fetal tissue for research and approved costs for preserving and transporting them. Many made profits on it. PPH did not.

LostandFound ago

Actually James O'Keefe was the victim of a smear campaign as he dug deep into the ACORN foundation and got the truth out of them, more pedo sponsorship. He was involved with Andrew Breitbart during this investigation which resulted in AB calling Podesta a child molester on twitter and dying shortly after. Pretty much everything he said was shown to now be true in the cold hard light of day. Its difficult to implicate people when they are in power obumer made sure of that.

Votescam ago

James O'Keefe is involved with smear campaigns, not a victim of them. O'Keefe's MO is heavily edited videos which attempt to lie to the public, but usually are immediately debunked. ACORN was merely registering Democratic voters, which actually didn't suit either party because they weren't interested in liberal Dems. Rahm Emmanuel/DP was soliciting "blue dogs" and right wing Dems who would support corporatism. https://shadowproof.com/2010/01/26/rahm-emanuel-liberals-are-f-king-retarded/ http://inthesetimes.com/article/17548/rahm_emanuel_unions

James Edward O'Keefe III (born June 28, 1984) is an American conservative political activist.[2][3] He produces secretly recorded undercover audio and video encounters, some selectively edited to imply its subjects said things they did not,[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O%27Keefe

LostandFound ago

My word your entire response was based from a Wikipedia article.

That article references a time article written 3 weeks before the election about events that took place over five years before. Where was was time then? Not even slightly interested.

Since we're referencing complete toilet roll .... I present the great snopes discussing was Scott Foval fired or did he leave over the o'keefe videos. You will love this they reference the post who also does not deny any of the accusations made but discusses the finer vagaries of Scott's departure http://www.snopes.com/2016/10/19/scott-foval-reportedly-fired-from-political-organization-over-sting-videos/ .

Back down into your hole $hill bring your A game or don't bother.