Not too impressed with sourcing on that proving claims this Rabbi practices an appaling, non-kosher (pun unintended) form of Judaism.
Podesta has many ties to perverts and traffickers. Let's not muddy the waters with unsubstantiated claims about someone's membership to a religion (or a perversion of it).
There's a coordinated effort to censor information critical of Jews. This has been an ongoing trend for sometime now, however I've just decided to finally draw some attention to the issue.
Here's a comment I made that was in direct response to somebody. It was marked as "spam" and removed.
This submission contained solid evidence which was directly related to the Pizzagate investigation, and yet because the OP dared to mention Jews the submission was deleted and censored. This is part of an ongoing effort to label all talk of Jews as spam, thus justifying deletion. They've been selectively doing this for a while.
Listen, we all know that Jews, more than any other group, are engaged in lobbying efforts to restrict free speech, and this is what we're seeing here. The Jew seeks to rob us of our right to free speech. That's what this is.
We need to snuff this out immediately. Even if you don't agree with anything people say about Jews, you have to understand that Jew talk is the front line in the battle for free speech. That's the first place they start when attacking free speech. Hell, look at Holocaust revisionist laws in Europe. It's illegal to have a discussion about the Holocaust unless you agree with the official made up Jew version of events. Think about it, the Holocaust is the only event in human history that people aren't allowed to disagree with. It's against the law to oppose the Jewish version of events. This is the only event in human history where it's against the law to have your own opinion on on.
If you disagree with the Jews on this, the government will come put you in jail. Truly think I about that for a minute.
If you disagree with the Jews regarding a historical event, the government comes and puts you in jail.
This is where Jewish censorship leads us.
It starts small, like by deleting comments on forum boards, and then it ends big with the government putting you in jail for disagreeing with Jews .
I'm all for free speech, make no mistake. I'm just concerned about the lurker who finally decides to visit here and learn about PG. I don't want them coming here and getting the first impression that we're just a bunch of scary anti-Semites. We're fighting BS narratives as it is.
That's why I would much prefer we stick to direct PG leads and evidence around here, instead of meta discussion on Judaism. Perhaps such discussion would be better suited to the meta section until the point in which you can show x person expresses belief in specific y perversion because of comments that person made on z.
I think this is the problem, saying 'the Jew'. Its not helpful to portray every Jew in the world as part of a paedophile conspiracy. By all means point out those who are, or groups etc, but finding something incriminating by an influential jew and saying this is a Jewish conspiracy is stupid and not helpful. Catholics, Mormons, Muslims have been shown to harbour and enable rampant paedophilia. There are many groups involved, and I feel like the leadership of these groups involved have far more in common and work with fellow corrupt paedophiles. We are meant to be going after paedophiles, not 'the Jew.'
Your comment does not pass the logic test. You said " Listen, we all know that Jews, more than any other group are engaged in lobbying efforts to restrict free speech". Whaaat? Prove it! Or stop posting .
This is a tough subject. In my opinion, many of the Jewish leads are at least possibly relevant, and you're definitely correct on Jewish being among the most influential and connected groups. The problem is calling them out as "The Jews" sounds a little targeted, and could potentially take away some legitimacy from the investigation to the mainstream. I wouldn't advocate any censoring, or holding back info, but I'd be careful with phrasing because they are experts at using the anti-Semitism card and control the media, at least large portions.
I think we already saw a similar situation in the beginning of pizza gate, they seemed to want to push this as the result of an anti gay agenda, and gay persecution, but luckily that seemed to fail pretty quickly
view the rest of the comments →
nomorepepperoni ago
Not too impressed with sourcing on that proving claims this Rabbi practices an appaling, non-kosher (pun unintended) form of Judaism.
Podesta has many ties to perverts and traffickers. Let's not muddy the waters with unsubstantiated claims about someone's membership to a religion (or a perversion of it).
Mew-Two ago
There's a coordinated effort to censor information critical of Jews. This has been an ongoing trend for sometime now, however I've just decided to finally draw some attention to the issue.
Here's a comment I made that was in direct response to somebody. It was marked as "spam" and removed.
http://sli.mg/tzqEuA
Here's a submission that the /Pizzagate mods deleted despite it having 65+ votes.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1557190
This submission contained solid evidence which was directly related to the Pizzagate investigation, and yet because the OP dared to mention Jews the submission was deleted and censored. This is part of an ongoing effort to label all talk of Jews as spam, thus justifying deletion. They've been selectively doing this for a while.
Listen, we all know that Jews, more than any other group, are engaged in lobbying efforts to restrict free speech, and this is what we're seeing here. The Jew seeks to rob us of our right to free speech. That's what this is.
We need to snuff this out immediately. Even if you don't agree with anything people say about Jews, you have to understand that Jew talk is the front line in the battle for free speech. That's the first place they start when attacking free speech. Hell, look at Holocaust revisionist laws in Europe. It's illegal to have a discussion about the Holocaust unless you agree with the official made up Jew version of events. Think about it, the Holocaust is the only event in human history that people aren't allowed to disagree with. It's against the law to oppose the Jewish version of events. This is the only event in human history where it's against the law to have your own opinion on on.
If you disagree with the Jews on this, the government will come put you in jail. Truly think I about that for a minute.
If you disagree with the Jews regarding a historical event, the government comes and puts you in jail.
This is where Jewish censorship leads us.
It starts small, like by deleting comments on forum boards, and then it ends big with the government putting you in jail for disagreeing with Jews .
nomorepepperoni ago
I'm all for free speech, make no mistake. I'm just concerned about the lurker who finally decides to visit here and learn about PG. I don't want them coming here and getting the first impression that we're just a bunch of scary anti-Semites. We're fighting BS narratives as it is.
That's why I would much prefer we stick to direct PG leads and evidence around here, instead of meta discussion on Judaism. Perhaps such discussion would be better suited to the meta section until the point in which you can show x person expresses belief in specific y perversion because of comments that person made on z.
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
I think this is the problem, saying 'the Jew'. Its not helpful to portray every Jew in the world as part of a paedophile conspiracy. By all means point out those who are, or groups etc, but finding something incriminating by an influential jew and saying this is a Jewish conspiracy is stupid and not helpful. Catholics, Mormons, Muslims have been shown to harbour and enable rampant paedophilia. There are many groups involved, and I feel like the leadership of these groups involved have far more in common and work with fellow corrupt paedophiles. We are meant to be going after paedophiles, not 'the Jew.'
OccamsTaser ago
well said.
speckledcat ago
I would say zionist and not jew. Because I am sure most jewish people that arent zionists are appalled at what is happening.
4warned ago
Your comment does not pass the logic test. You said " Listen, we all know that Jews, more than any other group are engaged in lobbying efforts to restrict free speech". Whaaat? Prove it! Or stop posting .
CantWeJustDroneHim ago
This is a tough subject. In my opinion, many of the Jewish leads are at least possibly relevant, and you're definitely correct on Jewish being among the most influential and connected groups. The problem is calling them out as "The Jews" sounds a little targeted, and could potentially take away some legitimacy from the investigation to the mainstream. I wouldn't advocate any censoring, or holding back info, but I'd be careful with phrasing because they are experts at using the anti-Semitism card and control the media, at least large portions.
I think we already saw a similar situation in the beginning of pizza gate, they seemed to want to push this as the result of an anti gay agenda, and gay persecution, but luckily that seemed to fail pretty quickly
projection ago
Fully agree with you.