They're going to try and claim Photoshop with what's potentially gigabytes upon gigabytes of photos and possibly even videographic evidence coupled with the existing documentation and all the deep level corruption at places like The Clinton Foundation.
From a technical standpoint, you can try and fake one or even a few photos or whole image galleries. However even a short video becomes impossible to fake 100% because look at that's Assange video where we know it was faked because of the way his eyes and his clothing were folding and closing in weird ways. It became obvious after just a couple minutes once it was slowed down and freeze-framed.
Couple this with the Jeffrey Epstein connections and the Dennis Hastert convictions along with the banned Conspiracy of Silence documentary that's been leaked to YouTube that you should all share via social media with friends, family, and whomever will listen, it'll be beyond any doubt that the evidence is real and these people are all very much involved in some type of worldwide satanic ritual abuse pedophile cult.
https://youtu.be/sQHrbJPhus4
A higher quality version of Conspiracy of Silence - 1994 - PLEASE watch if you haven't already and SHARE THE LINK!
There has to be. Remember it is how they keep people loyal in the inner circle. For that to happen, they must have video proof of that individual committing an act so heinous that the public will lock them up and throw away the key. Some hacker somewhere has to have these videos.
You just made me gleefully chuckle. There will most likely be irrefutable video, to which this pathetic set-up will fall flat on its face, like everything they do. "Duurrr, Russia CGI-ed me into the video, DUURRRRR"
Thats probably why they've been saying all the CGI stuff when trying to claim JA is dead or missing. So they can then use it when their faces are in the vids.
'The vids'... If there are videos, the likelihood it encompasses even 1% of the perps is not good.
Have we yet had any evidence Assange is really out there? I mean, the interviews could easily be faked, and all the proof required that was easily suppliable was denied. The whole wiki JA thing was never resolved for me. I think the technocrats are doing their worst atm.
view the rest of the comments →
ArthurEdens ago
What will they say when it's them in the porn
IWishIWasFoxMulder ago
They're going to try and claim Photoshop with what's potentially gigabytes upon gigabytes of photos and possibly even videographic evidence coupled with the existing documentation and all the deep level corruption at places like The Clinton Foundation.
From a technical standpoint, you can try and fake one or even a few photos or whole image galleries. However even a short video becomes impossible to fake 100% because look at that's Assange video where we know it was faked because of the way his eyes and his clothing were folding and closing in weird ways. It became obvious after just a couple minutes once it was slowed down and freeze-framed.
Couple this with the Jeffrey Epstein connections and the Dennis Hastert convictions along with the banned Conspiracy of Silence documentary that's been leaked to YouTube that you should all share via social media with friends, family, and whomever will listen, it'll be beyond any doubt that the evidence is real and these people are all very much involved in some type of worldwide satanic ritual abuse pedophile cult.
https://youtu.be/sQHrbJPhus4 A higher quality version of Conspiracy of Silence - 1994 - PLEASE watch if you haven't already and SHARE THE LINK!
knight222 ago
That Russians hacked their faces!
juhos ago
Regards, CNN
Htaed ago
There has to be. Remember it is how they keep people loyal in the inner circle. For that to happen, they must have video proof of that individual committing an act so heinous that the public will lock them up and throw away the key. Some hacker somewhere has to have these videos.
luckyguy ago
The fairies get the final say.
throwaway345678 ago
Rasputin did it.
catslovejustice ago
LOL!!!
GoHeadBeGoneWithIt ago
Russian black magic!!
Pizza-related-sap ago
You just made me gleefully chuckle. There will most likely be irrefutable video, to which this pathetic set-up will fall flat on its face, like everything they do. "Duurrr, Russia CGI-ed me into the video, DUURRRRR"
VieBleu ago
They'll say "Photoshop" and that's supposed to be the end of it.
jewsbadnews ago
Can't wait to see all the leftist sheeple blindly believe it like everything else.
ArthurEdens ago
If it's video they'll say russia used that assange face trick
RexAxisMundi ago
Thats probably why they've been saying all the CGI stuff when trying to claim JA is dead or missing. So they can then use it when their faces are in the vids.
PolybiusPizza ago
Next level double think... GJ!
'The vids'... If there are videos, the likelihood it encompasses even 1% of the perps is not good. Have we yet had any evidence Assange is really out there? I mean, the interviews could easily be faked, and all the proof required that was easily suppliable was denied. The whole wiki JA thing was never resolved for me. I think the technocrats are doing their worst atm.
TRUTHWARRIOR ago
Thats exactly my question bahahahahahahahahahaha