That's not even part of rule 2. I made the case clearly connecting him to John Podesta and his kabbalism and what Kabbalists condone. You need to be banned as a mod. Several people have accused him of being a shill and he has an obvious bias against what I'm writing and he is deleting this simply b/c he doesn't agree with it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your only "evidence" is passages from the Talmud that you are trying to force a particular interpretation onto. If the same standard were applied to the Bible, it would make Christianity look pretty awful. And of course it is nowhere near evidence that Michael Lerner, let alone Jews as a group (whether they "follow" the Talmud or not), support pedophilia.
Not to mention that Podesta receiving emails from him doesn't mean he's "Podesta's Rabbi." Podesta is Catholic, numbnuts.
I'm not forcing an interpretation onto anything, you even agreed that the literal interpretation was this. You cited a source that didn't even have the full text in question. You can't be this dumb.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
deleting per rule 2: OP has no provided sufficient evidence of Michael Lerner being connected to pedophilia
ich1baN ago
That's not even part of rule 2. I made the case clearly connecting him to John Podesta and his kabbalism and what Kabbalists condone. You need to be banned as a mod. Several people have accused him of being a shill and he has an obvious bias against what I'm writing and he is deleting this simply b/c he doesn't agree with it.
@YingYangMom @Investigate1999 @Vindicator @Spoor @yuke @redditsuckz @followdamoney @disciple7 @victuruslibertas @Singleservename @wokethefkup @queen_laqueefa @Fateswebb @ich1ban @OrwellKnew @andrevandelft @carmencita @quantokitty @The_Kuru @kekistocrat @biebergangrape @Ronnilynn31 @Singleservename @PaulyWalnuts7 @KittyTigerlily @largepepperoni
@DonkeyOatey [J] @rktyp [J] @belphegorsprime [M] @wecanhelp [M] @OTPROPHET [J] @Valkore [J] @Vindicator [J] @gopluckyourself [J] @Kwijibo [J] @l4l1lul3l0 [J]
@kingkongwaswrong [O] @Crensch [O] @heygeorge [D] @VictorSteinerDavion [O] @Phobos_Mothership
Millennial_Falcon ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your only "evidence" is passages from the Talmud that you are trying to force a particular interpretation onto. If the same standard were applied to the Bible, it would make Christianity look pretty awful. And of course it is nowhere near evidence that Michael Lerner, let alone Jews as a group (whether they "follow" the Talmud or not), support pedophilia.
Not to mention that Podesta receiving emails from him doesn't mean he's "Podesta's Rabbi." Podesta is Catholic, numbnuts.
ich1baN ago
I'm not forcing an interpretation onto anything, you even agreed that the literal interpretation was this. You cited a source that didn't even have the full text in question. You can't be this dumb.
Investigate1999 ago
The funny thing is that our interpretation doesn't matter, because the pedophiles could use the loosest interpretation to justify their urges.