That's not even part of rule 2. I made the case clearly connecting him to John Podesta and his kabbalism and what Kabbalists condone. You need to be banned as a mod. Several people have accused him of being a shill and he has an obvious bias against what I'm writing and he is deleting this simply b/c he doesn't agree with it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your only "evidence" is passages from the Talmud that you are trying to force a particular interpretation onto. If the same standard were applied to the Bible, it would make Christianity look pretty awful. And of course it is nowhere near evidence that Michael Lerner, let alone Jews as a group (whether they "follow" the Talmud or not), support pedophilia.
Not to mention that Podesta receiving emails from him doesn't mean he's "Podesta's Rabbi." Podesta is Catholic, numbnuts.
Here it is again since you decided to ignore my response to your comment:
And I just rebutted it. YOUR link COMPLETELY ignores the distinction between 3 years and 1 day... it doesn't even mention it in fact. It's trying to make Kethuboth 11b appear as if it didn't even write about this distinction of less than and greater than this age which is to completely miss the interpretation the rabbis were debating in the first place which is whether there is any injury or harm done to a child less than 3 years and 1 day or not and whether the man is liable for paying her for losing her virginity to WHICH THEY CONCLUDE THAT SHE IS NOT INJURED AND THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE TO PAY ANY COMPENSATION..... You can't be this dunder headed and doltish.
YOUR source also completely IGNORED the 3rd case which is a boy who has sexual relations with a woman.
Unfortunately bro, these ShillMods will stop at nothing to cover up the truth. I don't trust a goddamned one of them. Their actions have certainly proven untrustworthy
Yea, I don't know if I should continue here or just go to a different board altogether... I've thoroughly proven with my posts that I'm for uncovering the truth and exposing the pedophiles and if that leads me to a Kabbalist Rabbi that was constantly emailing JP and this rabbi so happens to accept the Talmud, then why am I censored for it?
Oh the error if it turns out that Michael Lerner is connected in some major way and these psychos are here covering for him. :(
I noticed that, I think. I often marvelled by how the establishment hates-loves Jews. It's both sides, too. It's such a complex mental illusion, too, because we can't dismiss them as having no complaints, but why are we really protecting them or not protecting them?
And the fact that it's very circumstantial evidence it makes sense that a pedophile like JP and JA would naturally receive emails from a radical rabbi that was Hillary Clinton's former mentor who reads a book that condones such acts on moral and legal grounds.... sort of embarrassing for those here that are not shills and not connecting the dots. Thanks again for your steadfast reaction to responding to these strange pedo sympathizers.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
deleting per rule 2: OP has no provided sufficient evidence of Michael Lerner being connected to pedophilia
ich1baN ago
That's not even part of rule 2. I made the case clearly connecting him to John Podesta and his kabbalism and what Kabbalists condone. You need to be banned as a mod. Several people have accused him of being a shill and he has an obvious bias against what I'm writing and he is deleting this simply b/c he doesn't agree with it.
@YingYangMom @Investigate1999 @Vindicator @Spoor @yuke @redditsuckz @followdamoney @disciple7 @victuruslibertas @Singleservename @wokethefkup @queen_laqueefa @Fateswebb @ich1ban @OrwellKnew @andrevandelft @carmencita @quantokitty @The_Kuru @kekistocrat @biebergangrape @Ronnilynn31 @Singleservename @PaulyWalnuts7 @KittyTigerlily @largepepperoni
@DonkeyOatey [J] @rktyp [J] @belphegorsprime [M] @wecanhelp [M] @OTPROPHET [J] @Valkore [J] @Vindicator [J] @gopluckyourself [J] @Kwijibo [J] @l4l1lul3l0 [J]
@kingkongwaswrong [O] @Crensch [O] @heygeorge [D] @VictorSteinerDavion [O] @Phobos_Mothership
Millennial_Falcon ago
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Your only "evidence" is passages from the Talmud that you are trying to force a particular interpretation onto. If the same standard were applied to the Bible, it would make Christianity look pretty awful. And of course it is nowhere near evidence that Michael Lerner, let alone Jews as a group (whether they "follow" the Talmud or not), support pedophilia.
Not to mention that Podesta receiving emails from him doesn't mean he's "Podesta's Rabbi." Podesta is Catholic, numbnuts.
ich1baN ago
Here it is again since you decided to ignore my response to your comment:
And I just rebutted it. YOUR link COMPLETELY ignores the distinction between 3 years and 1 day... it doesn't even mention it in fact. It's trying to make Kethuboth 11b appear as if it didn't even write about this distinction of less than and greater than this age which is to completely miss the interpretation the rabbis were debating in the first place which is whether there is any injury or harm done to a child less than 3 years and 1 day or not and whether the man is liable for paying her for losing her virginity to WHICH THEY CONCLUDE THAT SHE IS NOT INJURED AND THAT HE DOES NOT HAVE TO PAY ANY COMPENSATION..... You can't be this dunder headed and doltish.
YOUR source also completely IGNORED the 3rd case which is a boy who has sexual relations with a woman.
@OrwellKnew @BLOODandHONOUR
OrwellKnew ago
Unfortunately bro, these ShillMods will stop at nothing to cover up the truth. I don't trust a goddamned one of them. Their actions have certainly proven untrustworthy
ich1baN ago
Yea, I don't know if I should continue here or just go to a different board altogether... I've thoroughly proven with my posts that I'm for uncovering the truth and exposing the pedophiles and if that leads me to a Kabbalist Rabbi that was constantly emailing JP and this rabbi so happens to accept the Talmud, then why am I censored for it?
Oh the error if it turns out that Michael Lerner is connected in some major way and these psychos are here covering for him. :(
OrwellKnew ago
It's amazing but the "Jewish" angle is mighty wedge the Establishment uses against us Truth researchers. They play it both ways when needed
I'm still struggling to find the proper responses
Investigate1999 ago
I noticed that, I think. I often marvelled by how the establishment hates-loves Jews. It's both sides, too. It's such a complex mental illusion, too, because we can't dismiss them as having no complaints, but why are we really protecting them or not protecting them?
ich1baN ago
And the fact that it's very circumstantial evidence it makes sense that a pedophile like JP and JA would naturally receive emails from a radical rabbi that was Hillary Clinton's former mentor who reads a book that condones such acts on moral and legal grounds.... sort of embarrassing for those here that are not shills and not connecting the dots. Thanks again for your steadfast reaction to responding to these strange pedo sympathizers.
OrwellKnew ago
Yes. They want to make it "anti-Jewish" when in reality it is ANTI-Pedophilia