Talmudic laws allow much worse than pedophilia, as long as it is done to goyim. Nothing new here.
I did find the Lerner connection strange initially because of Podesta's extensive links to the Vatican/Jesuits. But by now I consider them one big evil cult. A Satanic oecumene.
The Talmud does not endorse pedophilia. Shills are trying to get us branded as anti-semites, racists, neo-nazis, etc. Shill network coming out of the woodwork to upvote this post. OP accusing me of being a shill for deleting original post due to lack of a source.
Edit: Look at all the blatant anti-semitism in this thread. The proof is in the pudding. At least one user saying I must be Jewish, LOL.
Ichiban tends to think in black and white. You are either a Christian or not, everything else is suspect. I have commented to her recently that pizzagate is not owned by a Christian perspective.
A close reading of the bible would allow the assertion that it promotes polygamy for example beause Abraham had two or more wives. Or that emotional child abuse is okay in the name of Christian worship because God asked Abraham to decapitate his child so he went through all the motions before he was stopped, which must have been terrifying for the kid. etc.
You're opinion is so thoroughly off of christian tradition and history. First of all nowhere in the bible does it actually condone polygamy and this is well supported by New Testament which is the fulfilment of the OT and is the law. Just b/c a leader in ancient times was temporarily allowed to procreate with concubines b/c they were surrounded on all sides by their enemies does not mean that we can do the same today and no rational christian would ever think this... however there are CLEAR texts in the Talmud that do allow for rape of children. And the fact that you've ignored this in every single post you've written on this thread is pretty telling.
Also, the story of Abraham and Isaac is a lot more complex than you're making it out to be. Isaac was already sacrificed spiritually when God asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham knew God could do anything and was not worried about Isaac physically dying b/c he had trusted God up to that point to birth Isaac in Sarah's old age which was a miracle unto itself in their minds. Abraham knew that God would raise Isaac from the dead (foreshadowing of Jesus), and was not worried about this, but what God was doing is telling. He was testing Abraham. Whether Abraham had faith in God, and he succeeded. Obviously he was blessed for this and God stopped him.
Your comment is a typical argument made by atheists that I've encountered before - it's nothing new, but you are misunderstanding both cases when people like David had to have multiple wives for their very survival and existence as a race of people when men of war fighting age were often killed off in war and had to be replenished somehow.
Bahahaha you can't even respond or refute b/c you know you're logic is fucking twisted.... You're sitting here trying to compare that some ancient view of child rape being in a book that they still read today and accept as one of their most revered Rabbis doesn't hold any water, b/c well there are examples in the OT of King David having concubines, which one could use today as condoning polygamy, when no real christian actually condones polygamy. Classic.
view the rest of the comments →
Singleservename ago
Talmudic laws allow much worse than pedophilia, as long as it is done to goyim. Nothing new here.
I did find the Lerner connection strange initially because of Podesta's extensive links to the Vatican/Jesuits. But by now I consider them one big evil cult. A Satanic oecumene.
Millennial_Falcon ago
CALLING BULLSHIT. http://talmud.faithweb.com/articles/three.html
The Talmud does not endorse pedophilia. Shills are trying to get us branded as anti-semites, racists, neo-nazis, etc. Shill network coming out of the woodwork to upvote this post. OP accusing me of being a shill for deleting original post due to lack of a source.
Edit: Look at all the blatant anti-semitism in this thread. The proof is in the pudding. At least one user saying I must be Jewish, LOL.
VieBleu ago
Ichiban tends to think in black and white. You are either a Christian or not, everything else is suspect. I have commented to her recently that pizzagate is not owned by a Christian perspective.
A close reading of the bible would allow the assertion that it promotes polygamy for example beause Abraham had two or more wives. Or that emotional child abuse is okay in the name of Christian worship because God asked Abraham to decapitate his child so he went through all the motions before he was stopped, which must have been terrifying for the kid. etc.
ich1baN ago
You're opinion is so thoroughly off of christian tradition and history. First of all nowhere in the bible does it actually condone polygamy and this is well supported by New Testament which is the fulfilment of the OT and is the law. Just b/c a leader in ancient times was temporarily allowed to procreate with concubines b/c they were surrounded on all sides by their enemies does not mean that we can do the same today and no rational christian would ever think this... however there are CLEAR texts in the Talmud that do allow for rape of children. And the fact that you've ignored this in every single post you've written on this thread is pretty telling.
Also, the story of Abraham and Isaac is a lot more complex than you're making it out to be. Isaac was already sacrificed spiritually when God asked Abraham to sacrifice Isaac. Abraham knew God could do anything and was not worried about Isaac physically dying b/c he had trusted God up to that point to birth Isaac in Sarah's old age which was a miracle unto itself in their minds. Abraham knew that God would raise Isaac from the dead (foreshadowing of Jesus), and was not worried about this, but what God was doing is telling. He was testing Abraham. Whether Abraham had faith in God, and he succeeded. Obviously he was blessed for this and God stopped him.
Your comment is a typical argument made by atheists that I've encountered before - it's nothing new, but you are misunderstanding both cases when people like David had to have multiple wives for their very survival and existence as a race of people when men of war fighting age were often killed off in war and had to be replenished somehow.
VieBleu ago
please summarize in a tl:dr this kind of stuff is a waste of time for this forum
ich1baN ago
Bahahaha you can't even respond or refute b/c you know you're logic is fucking twisted.... You're sitting here trying to compare that some ancient view of child rape being in a book that they still read today and accept as one of their most revered Rabbis doesn't hold any water, b/c well there are examples in the OT of King David having concubines, which one could use today as condoning polygamy, when no real christian actually condones polygamy. Classic.