Wow. Seriously? Is anyone covering this? David Seaman? George Webb? Alex Jones?

Guys, Gals... this shit is for serious now. This is not something you fake. You can't fake it. This was established by Youtube as a legal defense mechanism. The origin of the YouTube Copyright bans was from the music/movie industries. And the NFL! It's usually pretty reasonable. DRM is DRM.

This? This takes effort. And this is rather unique.

Think about how quiet these allegations are about JA threatening PGG.

My main concern: Voat is essentially being painted into a corner. This is now the far-fringe no matter how true we believe it to be and how much evidence is presented. Coverage is extremely limited even in so called "fake news" channels.

Two possibilities:

1. Our friends with loud voices are waiting until 1/20 as part of a coordinated effort NOT to draw attention in order to avoid an O'pardon or some kind of pre-preemptive recourse in advance of the new deputy AG. (David Seaman even said he's "taking a break until the inauguration" in one of his vids)

2. Our friends with loud voices are legitimately scared/doubtful enough to avoid covering this. This seems hard to believe personally... unless they aren't seeing everything posted here on Voat. Or, perhaps. have received similar threats as PGG did.

Sure, there's mention of it on occasion... but this stuff is gold. It has legs. This is huge. No major online media source is really digging into the details being unearthed here. I personally think a brighter light is needed.

AND... IF THIS IS ALL COMPLETELY BS... It should be incredibly easy to explain away. So...? I'm reasonable. Where's the explanation? There is too much circumstance to ignore and say "You're making all of this up by looking for the connections". Wayyyy too much active cover-up to look the other way.

Clinton, Podesta, Alefantis, by all means... explain away. You've got plenty of free time now. (Except for JA who is busy running a pizza joint and apparently chasing YouTube videos)