You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

redberries ago

Ah here it is, I haven't read it because the blog is a clusterfuck. Please take it with a grain of salt. It's interesting, though: the blogger was speaking of this during August. https://mindcontrolblackassassins.com/category/ritual-satanic-sexual-abuse/

Ctrl+F "Maccoby"

asdfghjkl123456789 ago

Anyone reading this article take heed: don't be dismissive of all the occult stuff. It's not all literally real (think of it as an initiation ritual for a lot of these people), but it is incredibly important to understand the influence of secret societies.

The term "Lucifer" (Morning Star) comes from the Latin Vulgate translation of Isaiah 14. And if you look at the whole chapter, it's clearly talking about a man, mocking him for claiming to be the Morning Star. In the New Testament, Jesus says he is the Morning Star.

Ezekiel 28 is referring to a fallen angel (probably not Satan, but rather a demon in charge of the territory around Tyre). But applying the term "Lucifer" to Satan is not correct; it's an invention by the mystery schools, including modern freemasonry.

I want to say more about how this applies to the present situation, but I'm afraid I'll overwhelm people. I'll leave it at this: the actual followers of Satan today are top-level freemasonry, and its associated groups (Bohemian Grove, CFR, Bilderberg, CIA, MI6, etc.) And they THINK that they follow Lucifer, The Morning Star, The Light Bringer.

PresudentMcCheese ago

Satan is a fiction that you people invented to get children to do what you want them too. Scary.

asdfghjkl123456789 ago

That's not true, but it doesn't matter for our purposes here. THEY believe they are Lucifer worshipers. Knowing that will help you FIND THEM...

heywhatsgoingon ago

It doesn't matter what you believe, what matters is that they believe it and are acting on that basis.

asdfghjkl123456789 ago

Hell, many of THEM don't really believe it either. It's a means to an end.

specialplan ago

That blog and a few other connected ones have an almost Lyndon Larouche feel to them.

JoJoVoat ago

When was this written? I only saw one sentence in regards to Epstien but no evidence or links to evidence. Am I missing that?
Who wrote the article? A lefty liberal? If so then that explains that.

edit: so i looked at the link (citation 20) and so far they are saying his (Trump) name is supposedly in Epsteins little black book Also Trump is spelled with an f at the end of it (why?) and Clinton were mentioned way more in both articles but the author didnt put the Clinton name in the titles of either ...hmmmm....

Freemasonsrus ago

They tried to brownstone Trump through Epstein. It didn't work.

speepsie ago

What's brownstoning brah

Freemasonsrus ago

A CIA style "honey trap" that obtains video evidence of the subject in sexually compromising positions. Epstein would be a Brownstone. It has evolved from getting someone on film sleeping w someone other than their spouse to things much less palpable to the public, therefore better blackmailing material, like kids. Use it on whoever you'd like to control, govt officials, CEO's, MSM, ect.

See George Webb's series on YouTube for more info. You could start w day 73 and catch quite a lot of info.

SoonerJJ ago

It may be one of the reasons he decided to run for pres.

ArthurEdens ago

90% of dc voted for hillary so most of the town was probably hoping to keep the party going.

blinkofaneye ago

you can find sources at the end of the article. edit: he uses the name Drumpf, which is german for Trump. it is Donald's ancestoral surname.

blinkofaneye ago

the part about Breitbart and Donald Trump, will boggle the mind of everybody in the USA.

JoJoVoat ago

What is the minute mark for that?

BlackSwordsman ago

Which part?

RexAxisMundi ago

What part is that?