I think the tunnels are a canard and have already been used to ridicule the PG investigation when our false flag shooter came in 'looking for kids and tunnels' and that narrative went worldwide. Couple that with the 'Hillary Clinton runs a pedo ring out of a pizza joint', and you have two very powerful false commentaries pounded into the heads of millions of people still glued to the MSM, that this entire investigation is preposterous. Second, the McMartin Case where there was a fixation on tunnels that was flipped to discredit the child victims and erode the prosecution's case, is a cautionary tale about emphasizing what may be the weakest part of the case. The McMartin case needs to be studied by all PG researches to have an understanding of what role the media, the police and the courts play in destroying the credibility of witnesses, victims, and what looked like a rock solid case for conviction. The Wikipedia fake version > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial What really happened >> https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/mcmartin-preschool-case-what-really-happened-and-the-coverup/
But a shooter running in looking for tunnels and finding nothing is not a proof that no tunnels are used. If you look at the Pegasus metalworks they have some sort of rolling plateau. The floor can move, they don't use the closets anymore, they are just capable of moving the floor a bit to open up the staircase. Could be electrical powered.
Since this is a possibility I would not cancel out there is an underground connection.
If Comet Ping Pong is a front where parents can sell their childs or something, and then they are transported to Pegasus through tunnels. Sounds like an option which needs investigation.
You are way off... the room with the rolling viewing platforms is a torture chamber. It's not about covering tunnels.
Btw.. this is your ONLY Pizzagate submission and it's appears you're touting it and defending it in a level that belies your previous non interest in this subverse. What gives ? Why are you now so committed to this subject?
From the photo's with the rolling platform it looks like a sort of demo picture. Which gives an option it is an example of how a secret room could be made. Like a small prototype.
This is my first submission to voat, yes it is. And it's a valuable one, that is what counts. Don't be such a smartass, I was there when we questioned why they were using such strange word combinations (pizza, hotdogs) in the WikiLeaks.
I don't care if it is not, if you can prove it is not related please do so. But you are only shouting it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with subway tunnels, which makes me wonder how you know. And how you know exactly what the rolling platform is.
In case I'm wrong we spent some resources on something which turns out to be not true. You are trying to cancel an investigation into this subway tunnel dea which is highly suspicious and needs investigation. That is suspicious itself.
You superimposed a subway map over a street map and made some vague conclusions, so don't pat yourself on the back too hard. It's far from groundbreaking. I'm shocked this garnered so many likes, but like I said, people have some sort of fascination with tunnels. The importance of the Pegasus building is in the building, itself, and not what may or may not run under it.This tunnel thing is like arguing over whether kids are transported in blue vans, or black ones.
Many roads lead to Rome. I don't see what you problem is. If you are able to dive deeper into the building do so, even replying to my post is wasting your energy. As said it looks like there are tunnels beneath both Comet Ping Pong and the Pegasus Museum. The maps indicate this could be true.
And then there is this guy coming in: "No there are no tunnels, you should not look there." What is you problem dude? Why should we absolutely not look into those tunnels?
You've got the wrong guy here, I'm going for the tunnel narrative now. You are acting way too suspiscious.
My problem is this: Your shit about subway tunnels right when the focus of PG is put on this building is the DISTRACTION and I am pointing it out. There are NO SUBWAY TUNNELS THAT RUN BELOW COMET. Yet, you said they're were. You lied or you were wrong. You posted some weak crap that you said 'proved tunnels' and I immediately rebuked it. You told me to 'do research' as your stupid comment was being obliterated. Get real. Just who are you, and why did it take you so long to comment on this subverse ?
How do you know there are no subway tunnels below comet. The map indicates otherwise. You are pointing out it is a distraction without providing arguments why it is a distraction. The rest of your comment does not make sense. You make shit up about me proving stuff which is not true. I'm pointing it out it is suspicious and needs research. And I was never telling you to do research, just anybody who has time and also thinks it's suspicious.
It's none of your business to who I am. I'm doing my part in the works, like you do. Voat isn't the only platform you know. Look at my comments on other posts to see I'm not shilling.
Provide valid reasons of why this is a distraction. You did not and that is why it's even more suspicious.
view the rest of the comments →
remedy4reality ago
I think the tunnels are a canard and have already been used to ridicule the PG investigation when our false flag shooter came in 'looking for kids and tunnels' and that narrative went worldwide. Couple that with the 'Hillary Clinton runs a pedo ring out of a pizza joint', and you have two very powerful false commentaries pounded into the heads of millions of people still glued to the MSM, that this entire investigation is preposterous. Second, the McMartin Case where there was a fixation on tunnels that was flipped to discredit the child victims and erode the prosecution's case, is a cautionary tale about emphasizing what may be the weakest part of the case. The McMartin case needs to be studied by all PG researches to have an understanding of what role the media, the police and the courts play in destroying the credibility of witnesses, victims, and what looked like a rock solid case for conviction. The Wikipedia fake version > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McMartin_preschool_trial What really happened >> https://ritualabuse.us/ritualabuse/articles/mcmartin-preschool-case-what-really-happened-and-the-coverup/
BarryOSeven ago
Could as well be a canard.
But a shooter running in looking for tunnels and finding nothing is not a proof that no tunnels are used. If you look at the Pegasus metalworks they have some sort of rolling plateau. The floor can move, they don't use the closets anymore, they are just capable of moving the floor a bit to open up the staircase. Could be electrical powered.
Since this is a possibility I would not cancel out there is an underground connection.
If Comet Ping Pong is a front where parents can sell their childs or something, and then they are transported to Pegasus through tunnels. Sounds like an option which needs investigation.
remedy4reality ago
You are way off... the room with the rolling viewing platforms is a torture chamber. It's not about covering tunnels.
Btw.. this is your ONLY Pizzagate submission and it's appears you're touting it and defending it in a level that belies your previous non interest in this subverse. What gives ? Why are you now so committed to this subject?
BarryOSeven ago
So how do you know what it is exactly?
From the photo's with the rolling platform it looks like a sort of demo picture. Which gives an option it is an example of how a secret room could be made. Like a small prototype.
This is my first submission to voat, yes it is. And it's a valuable one, that is what counts. Don't be such a smartass, I was there when we questioned why they were using such strange word combinations (pizza, hotdogs) in the WikiLeaks.
I don't care if it is not, if you can prove it is not related please do so. But you are only shouting it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with subway tunnels, which makes me wonder how you know. And how you know exactly what the rolling platform is.
In case I'm wrong we spent some resources on something which turns out to be not true. You are trying to cancel an investigation into this subway tunnel dea which is highly suspicious and needs investigation. That is suspicious itself.
remedy4reality ago
You superimposed a subway map over a street map and made some vague conclusions, so don't pat yourself on the back too hard. It's far from groundbreaking. I'm shocked this garnered so many likes, but like I said, people have some sort of fascination with tunnels. The importance of the Pegasus building is in the building, itself, and not what may or may not run under it.This tunnel thing is like arguing over whether kids are transported in blue vans, or black ones.
BarryOSeven ago
Many roads lead to Rome. I don't see what you problem is. If you are able to dive deeper into the building do so, even replying to my post is wasting your energy. As said it looks like there are tunnels beneath both Comet Ping Pong and the Pegasus Museum. The maps indicate this could be true.
And then there is this guy coming in: "No there are no tunnels, you should not look there." What is you problem dude? Why should we absolutely not look into those tunnels?
You've got the wrong guy here, I'm going for the tunnel narrative now. You are acting way too suspiscious.
remedy4reality ago
My problem is this: Your shit about subway tunnels right when the focus of PG is put on this building is the DISTRACTION and I am pointing it out. There are NO SUBWAY TUNNELS THAT RUN BELOW COMET. Yet, you said they're were. You lied or you were wrong. You posted some weak crap that you said 'proved tunnels' and I immediately rebuked it. You told me to 'do research' as your stupid comment was being obliterated. Get real. Just who are you, and why did it take you so long to comment on this subverse ?
BarryOSeven ago
How do you know there are no subway tunnels below comet. The map indicates otherwise. You are pointing out it is a distraction without providing arguments why it is a distraction. The rest of your comment does not make sense. You make shit up about me proving stuff which is not true. I'm pointing it out it is suspicious and needs research. And I was never telling you to do research, just anybody who has time and also thinks it's suspicious.
It's none of your business to who I am. I'm doing my part in the works, like you do. Voat isn't the only platform you know. Look at my comments on other posts to see I'm not shilling.
Provide valid reasons of why this is a distraction. You did not and that is why it's even more suspicious.