I'm removing this under rule 1 as it is not explained how this relates to Pizzagate. Please make sure to spell out the connection to your audience before resubmitting. Thank you.
Everything should be understood. Nobody wants to live in confusion and darkness.
Of course, he could always spell it out more, but some things don't need to be explained over and over again. On the other hand, this specific topic is kind of new. However, people have been discussing Pizzagate gear for some time now.
If you need an explanation, then okay, but don't act like this is all new.
I can't be any clearer than this: we're enforcing rules, the rules have been vetted and accepted by the community, this post violated rule 1, I removed it due to that violation.
Your suggestion that it should be understood is in direct conflict with rule 1. You should know that as an active contributor of this sub, let alone as an ex-mod. We're not talking about novels here, one or two sentences putting a post into perspective in a community where information overload is a very real thing is all we're talking about, and enforcing. Please get over that.
By the way, for what it's worth, I have no axe to grind with you. I can't even remember your user name. I was just standing up for him, because I thought that it was right.
I honestly, want to see his posts deleted, and I felt that he was getting way too much attention. However, this was 1 post that seemed okay, at the time. This must make me look backwards to you. My point is that I was just trying to overcome my biases against him. For proof of that, you could see my posts and comments. I did try to present both sides of the argument, according to what I believed to be true. I also did try to help him to post in the other subverses, too.
one or two sentences putting a post into perspective in a community where information overload is a very real thing is all we're talking about, and enforcing. Please get over that.
view the rest of the comments →
wecanhelp ago
I'm removing this under rule 1 as it is not explained how this relates to Pizzagate. Please make sure to spell out the connection to your audience before resubmitting. Thank you.
Investigate1999 ago
It should be understood that he contacted James A., so it makes sense that he is under investigation. I'm surprised that you don't know that.
wecanhelp ago
Nothing should be understood, as per rule 1. I'm surprised that you don't know that.
Investigate1999 ago
Everything should be understood. Nobody wants to live in confusion and darkness.
Of course, he could always spell it out more, but some things don't need to be explained over and over again. On the other hand, this specific topic is kind of new. However, people have been discussing Pizzagate gear for some time now.
If you need an explanation, then okay, but don't act like this is all new.
wecanhelp ago
I can't be any clearer than this: we're enforcing rules, the rules have been vetted and accepted by the community, this post violated rule 1, I removed it due to that violation.
Your suggestion that it should be understood is in direct conflict with rule 1. You should know that as an active contributor of this sub, let alone as an ex-mod. We're not talking about novels here, one or two sentences putting a post into perspective in a community where information overload is a very real thing is all we're talking about, and enforcing. Please get over that.
Investigate1999 ago
By the way, for what it's worth, I have no axe to grind with you. I can't even remember your user name. I was just standing up for him, because I thought that it was right.
I honestly, want to see his posts deleted, and I felt that he was getting way too much attention. However, this was 1 post that seemed okay, at the time. This must make me look backwards to you. My point is that I was just trying to overcome my biases against him. For proof of that, you could see my posts and comments. I did try to present both sides of the argument, according to what I believed to be true. I also did try to help him to post in the other subverses, too.
wecanhelp ago
It's all cool.
Investigate1999 ago
Fair enough. Good point.