You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

Millennial_Falcon ago

Flairing "accuracy in question," based on the title (ALL Stratfor members?), all the users disagreeing with OP's assumptions, and this thread. Honestly, this is a huge wall of text, and it's very hard to discern the value of it given how it is presented.

I would recommend editing and condensing this to main points. You don't need everything written word-for-word (you can use embedded links as proof). I would suggest organizing your points in a coherent, condensed fashion, and making an objective assessment of the relative strength of the evidence, rather than assuming this proves ALL Stratfor members are pedophiles (confirmation bias is a hell of a drug, LOL). Basically, when you comb through a huge amount of data, it's easy to find stuff that could be construed as confirming what you're looking for. Some of this seems like it could be genuine references to pedophilia, but some of it probably isn't. This point is your title is WAY overblown.