How so? We're just getting a lot of submissions lately that violate our submission-quality rules. The sub is still relatively new, so there are a lot of users who are submitting posts without reading the rules carefully. Also, we're getting attacked by shills (such as with the porn flood attack yesterday) who spam irrelevant stuff.
Honestly, the submission-quality rules are too strict. Things like "titles have to clearly indicate connection to pizzagate" are just onerous. The result is a lot of reasonable stuff is getting deleted for technicalities like that.
The user can always repost with a better title, and can you give an example of a good post that was removed? If you find an example of such, please us know. We don't want good leads or evidence to slip through the cracks anymore than you do. I really don't think that's happening, though. Some users just need time to adjust to the rules. It's really not that hard to make a post that follows the rules:
Establish that there's a good possibility it's directly relevant to pizzagate investigation (avoid cheerleading and unsourced meta discussion), source any factual claims (if it's genuinely a fact, you can find a source, otherwise just acknowledge it's an opinion/claim), and make a title that demonstrates relevance and accurately describes the content of the post (and post as a discussion post to explain relevance if necessary). That's basically it.
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
How so? We're just getting a lot of submissions lately that violate our submission-quality rules. The sub is still relatively new, so there are a lot of users who are submitting posts without reading the rules carefully. Also, we're getting attacked by shills (such as with the porn flood attack yesterday) who spam irrelevant stuff.
Baluga ago
Honestly, the submission-quality rules are too strict. Things like "titles have to clearly indicate connection to pizzagate" are just onerous. The result is a lot of reasonable stuff is getting deleted for technicalities like that.
Millennial_Falcon ago
The user can always repost with a better title, and can you give an example of a good post that was removed? If you find an example of such, please us know. We don't want good leads or evidence to slip through the cracks anymore than you do. I really don't think that's happening, though. Some users just need time to adjust to the rules. It's really not that hard to make a post that follows the rules:
Establish that there's a good possibility it's directly relevant to pizzagate investigation (avoid cheerleading and unsourced meta discussion), source any factual claims (if it's genuinely a fact, you can find a source, otherwise just acknowledge it's an opinion/claim), and make a title that demonstrates relevance and accurately describes the content of the post (and post as a discussion post to explain relevance if necessary). That's basically it.