Was a study by Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovich and Robert Bauserman published in the Psychological Bulletin that argued child sexual abuse often doesn't harm boys, and advocated replacing the term with "adult/child sex" and dropping the words "victim" and "perpetrator" in many cases. The study caused public outrage and both the U.S. Senate and House voted to condemn it, but it has still been used by some, even in court cases, to justify pedophilia.
"Harmful to Minors," 2002'
Is a book by writer Judith Levine which also promoted "adult-child sex" and received a lot of criticism. Levine cried "censorship" and was defended by the left, including web sites like Salon, Alternet, and the Huffington Post. Levine sits on the board of the National Center for Reason and Justice, a "501(c)3 non-profit organization that educates and advocates for child-protective laws and criminal justice practices based on science, fairness, and good sense; and supports people who are falsely accused or convicted of crimes against children." http://archive.is/HMcxAhttp://archive.is/xewyg
Harris Mirkin's promotion of pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality
Outrage over Levine's book brought new attention to an old article by late University of Missouri professor Harris Mirkin which had been published in the Journal of Homosexuality and which promoted pedophilia. Missouri's House fined the university $100,000 as punishment for the article.
B4UAct
Is "a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists" that in recent years attempted to influence what the latest edition of psychiatry's manual of disorders, the DSM, says about pedophilia.
Pedophilia Chic (1996) and Pedophilia Chic Reconsidered (2001)
A series of articles written by Mary Eberstadt and published in the Weekly Standard that studied the recent history, to that point, of promoting pedophilia on the left. Still relevant.
view the rest of the comments →
Psalm100 ago
I just posted a thread on the recent history of elites attempting to normalize pedophile. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1535361
The thread covers:
The Rind study, 1998
Was a study by Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovich and Robert Bauserman published in the Psychological Bulletin that argued child sexual abuse often doesn't harm boys, and advocated replacing the term with "adult/child sex" and dropping the words "victim" and "perpetrator" in many cases. The study caused public outrage and both the U.S. Senate and House voted to condemn it, but it has still been used by some, even in court cases, to justify pedophilia.
"Harmful to Minors," 2002'
Is a book by writer Judith Levine which also promoted "adult-child sex" and received a lot of criticism. Levine cried "censorship" and was defended by the left, including web sites like Salon, Alternet, and the Huffington Post. Levine sits on the board of the National Center for Reason and Justice, a "501(c)3 non-profit organization that educates and advocates for child-protective laws and criminal justice practices based on science, fairness, and good sense; and supports people who are falsely accused or convicted of crimes against children." http://archive.is/HMcxA http://archive.is/xewyg
Harris Mirkin's promotion of pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality
Outrage over Levine's book brought new attention to an old article by late University of Missouri professor Harris Mirkin which had been published in the Journal of Homosexuality and which promoted pedophilia. Missouri's House fined the university $100,000 as punishment for the article.
B4UAct
Is "a group of pro-pedophile mental health professionals and sympathetic activists" that in recent years attempted to influence what the latest edition of psychiatry's manual of disorders, the DSM, says about pedophilia.
Pedophilia Chic (1996) and Pedophilia Chic Reconsidered (2001)
A series of articles written by Mary Eberstadt and published in the Weekly Standard that studied the recent history, to that point, of promoting pedophilia on the left. Still relevant.
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1535361