QUOTE: "At that time [1942], a number of prominent social scientists openly spelled out their goal, of using the wartime-tested techniques of mass psychological manipulation, to pervert and control the American people. And in most instances, their emphasis was on children, and the need to destroy the fabric of family life."
FROM - From Cybernetics to Littleton - Techniques in Mind Control
by Jeffrey Steinberg
http://www.schillerinstitute.org/new_viol/cybmindcontrol_js0400..html
This paper starts off with this:
"The $9 billion a year video-game industry in America, which contributed mightily to the carnage
at Littleton, Paducah, and Jonesboro, is far more than the mere commercial exploitation of
techniques and technologies developed as legitimate'' training
instruments for the military and law enforcement agencies.
To understand the roots of this new form ofManchurian Candidate'' programmed
terrorism, it is necessary to go back to World War II and the immediate postwar period,
when there was a concerted effort launched, by the Frankfurt School and the
London Tavistock Institute, to use the Marxist/Freudian perversion of psychology
and other social sciences, as instruments for mass social control and brainwashing.
The two pillars of the assault on the American intellectual tradition were cybernetics
and the drug counterculture."
( This paper was found after looking at that long list of think tanks recently posted on this thread )
https://isgp-studies.com/ngo-list-foundations-and-think-tanks-worldwide#dst
check - 1930, Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation (Macy Foundation).
see this topic -
##Cerebral Inhibition Meeting 1942 --
http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/foundations/history/MacyPeople.htm
(note idiotic logo - dragon and salamander )
http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/foundations/history/MacyPeople.htm
and these big brains cannot agree on their invented word - http://www.asc-cybernetics.org/foundations/definitions.htm
Simple summary - "two topics on the agenda were hypnotism and conditioned reflex"
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Josiah_Macy,_Jr._Foundation
extra creepy -
LSD, Mind Control, and the Internet: A Chronology
"1942: The Cerebral Inhibition Meeting, sponsored by the Josiah Macy Foundation, organized by Frank Fremont-Smith. Gregory Bateson, Margaret Mead, and five others members of the (later) Cybernetics Group attended. Meeting focused on "physiological mechanisms underlying the phenomena of conditioned reflexes and hypnosis as related to the problem of cerebral inhibition."
Long Island Biological Laboratories research project, headed by Harold Abramson, established in part with Macy funds, and with support from the War Department. Abramson was then a Major in the Technical Division, Chemical Warfare service."
http://people.virginia.edu/~jmu2m/SLS.htm
additional -
(pre AI history and the maniacs who direct computer science path)
http://www.informatics.indiana.edu/rocha/academics/i501/pdfs/i501_lecture4_slides.pdf
After reading that short history of the war-gamers and computer history and mind control fanatics in top science positions I wonder if the child trafficking pedofiles we scrutiny as #pizzagate researchers get their immunity from prosecution and media blackout on their crimes because they are part of this mass social "experiment".
Is the reason the D.C. pedo ring, the Franklin cover-up was smothered because they were a product of of this "hypnotism and conditioned reflex" experiment?
Did control masters who attended the 1942 conference lay the groundwork for today's pizzagate (specifically the D.C. pedo ring associated with the Podesta e-mails and Comet Ping Pong)? And did they lay the groundwork for Epstein's freedom of movement to commit so many crimes and Saville's obscenities and the Hempstead group and other covens?
Is the apparent immunity enjoyed by the Podesta brothers and James Alefantis because of some association with a think tank?
view the rest of the comments →
ghost_marauder ago
Yes, given the amount of money that is being pumped into censorship technology this very well could be. Given the amount of historic knowledge that is being dredged from the deep though, I doubt it.
Probably not, you have rich people in power covering shit on a regular basis. The Franklin case also involved the reputation of a credit union which would not liked to be talked about negatively (because a lot of people are concerned for good reason about image). So, I just don't think so.
That part is where I see smaller tests going on. Creepy Clowns on social media & that type of stuff seems to be in line. Doing a large scale hoax usually seems to fail (I know Sandy Hooks failed with at least 50% of the country).
Only if they were having pizza parties
No, that perv has CIA runner written all over him. Moving on.
Or is it because they're the fucking shadow government? Seriously, they have too much shit and too many connections. They're like a capstone. You bust them and the whole thing comes tumbling down.
flyingcuttlefish ago
I conclude you didn't read the paper - http://www.schillerinstitute.org/new_viol/cybmindcontrol_js0400..html
ghost_marauder ago
I have, and it's fairly loosely tied shit. "We're going to train soldiers through video games."
That premise is dumb as fuck. You take a person who has played video games and put them on the battle field with a soldier and you'll have a fairly obvious outcome. You put a person playing strategy video games against a general and have them both in charge of a battle, you'll have a fairly obvious outcome. The best I've seen for combative training in video games is a general idea of how to sabotage shit, and I know very few people who could make their own thermite.
Guess what, it wasn't nice for geeks in the early days. It's a movement of their own design because they found it interesting. Some jackass writing a paper on the subject does not mean they run the show. Quite literally from the 80's until the mid 90's computing was the wild west of technology. Maybe the big boys were running the show in the corporations, but the little guys were the ones that really made up the movement.
And yes, there are three factors that gave rise to the popular and current form of the internet. Video games, Universities, and Porn.
For the rest of it. Nepotism - this paper just describes nepotism and a desire to lower the common man. All to likely yes, and in line with the frankfort school of thought. Cultural marxists have swarmed the computer science world, they've also been there in the beginning (just not as much). But, the CMs have been ramping up all over the place lately. I'm more interested in what's bringing about their current furvor than where it came from (because I already know).
The rest is just "Men who stare at goats"