I'm just an observer here, albeit a hard-working, educated one. I have to ask: DOES DAVID SEAMAN DO "STELLAR" WORK? If so, please tell us what "work" he does. Does he have an education? I've never heard or read about it anywhere. All I know is that I never heard of this whiny little millennial until I started following the Wikileaks story, which morphed into the Pizzagate story. And I saw everyone online talking about this supposedly cutting-edge journalist named David Seaman, so I watched his videos. But all he does is whine, repeat the same points over and over, and make accusations (which have not yet been proven in a court of law) against the big names linked to this scandal. If I were one of the targets of Seaman's rants, I'd surely sue for defamation (slander and libel). Of course, the lack of lawsuits against Seaman raises its own set of questions. Bottom line, though, whether what this kid says is true or false, he is off-putting to a great many people because (1) he's a whiner; (2) he doesn't do "work" on this; (3) he's constantly asking for donations from others; (4) he undermines his own credibility by outwardly admitting that he's a stoner (living in a state in which pot is not "legal" -- not that it's truly legal anywhere, given that the federal laws have not been repealed). Bottom line of the bottom line is that this guy seems to be quite unstable, a legend in his own mind, and not very credible. Yep, I said it. If this stuff of Pizzagate is real, I would suggest a far more stable and credible spokesman than this kid.
He got this video to streissand and trend, so that's worth it. If you have a more stable and credible spokesman, fine, share it!
At this point he's the best I've seen. He's not only one who I've not heard make a single unsourcable claim. He also shares on gab.ai the evidence for things that people want to check.
I get your point, he is rather repetitive, but free speech is free speech.
If he's made specific allegations to an individual, it is their right to sue him ... but they don't work that way do they? If it went to court, and he counter sued based on a public interest defense, then dirty little secrets and facts might get investigated or subpoenas start flying around ... TPTB never do it this way, especially in regards to elite pedophile investigations ... they go to their elite friends in Alphabet, PayPal, etc, and attempt to apply pressure from a different angle, other than using the law, which would expose them to direct scrutiny. Just look at the Dutroux case, or the Franklin case ... the whistleblowers were leaned on from every possible direction, except in the actual court room.
In my opinion, this just highlights the high level connections that the Podesta's and David Brock have in D.C., and their ability to create their own extrajudicial mob-style campaign of silencing their critics. THEY are the ones who got political in their careers, and THEY are the ones who should be scrutinized publicly for their actions and affiliations. How did Alefantis make it into GQ's 50 most 'influential' people in Washington again? And why is the Washington Post, whose two ex-editors/journalist owners of Politics & Prose, leading the charge against Pizzagate investigators? THEY are the ones who have to answer for their actions, and Seaman has just been pointing that out--albeit a little bit whiney :)
Screwing with someones right to transfer money between peers, is a little bit more serious that someone having a personal gripe with the guy based on an actual slander. If Podesta and Brock have a problem, and are innocent, let them use the LAW, not dirty tricks to lean on this guys god given right to:
1) Speak his mind freely (free speech).
2) Have equal commercial service (ie, if a pizza shop now sells pizzas, but won't cater a gay wedding, they will lose their business license for refusing to allow service to certain customers. Why is this any different for PayPal as long as Seaman is not money laundering? ... or they haven't actually given him a legitimate reason based on illegal activities involving monetary transactions?) Cancelling small peer-to-peer transactions by his patrons is in my mind, a baseless refusal of service, based on his political positions, and is discrimination.
These are the people who want ALL monetary transactions to be electronic for goodness sakes. Imagine if I dropped you in a desert without any water and you died of dehydration: Did I violate your human rights? Are monetary transactions as important as water in today's world? PayPal needs to be lawfully regulated to ensure equal treatment of its consumers, just as everyone else is. They have no right to interfere in a personal gripe that some cabal has over this guys opinion. Seaman should be able to sue them for violating his human rights.
Excellent post; great points. I agree with everything you said. Yup, yup. The Pizza People will probably never sue him, because they would not want to subject themselves to the scrutiny that a lawsuit would involve. And yup, I agree that Seaman should file a lawsuit against Paypal if it froze his money. I hate Paypal -- always have -- so I never read its Terms of Service. I guess anyone whose funds have been frozen should read the TOS to see if they agreed to this kind of thing. I'd love to see lawsuits filed -- the truth always has a way of coming out in lawsuits. So I guess we'll see. In any case, thank you for this post, @PieInTheEye. Happy New Year.
Happy New Year to you too. Though I have a feeling it will be another year of leftist nutjobs destroying western civilization whilst proclaiming to be the victims. If the EU collapses though, it'll definitely be a happy year!
honestly couldn't agree more... maybe for a slightly diff reason, as im a firm believer in pizzagate and goverment involved pedophilia... considering they get caught all the time.
but this seaman guy makes pathetic videos, everything he talks about is recycled old info, he never talks about new very suspect leads, and that seems to almost do more damage then if he said nothing at all. he whines about donations being cut from youtube.. if he cared he'd be doing these vids merely to spread the word, not clickbait and make a few bucks. not to mention, MANY people lost ad revenue from youtube changing how it works, even hillary supporting but non political youtubers.
and for what its worth, i sell a lot of clothing online and ive donated to game developers on patreon using paypal, and ive been in similar situations with paypal.. its usually not a big deal, everything just needs to get verified. sometimes if you have a certain amount of money going in/out theyll lock your account for reasons of security.. just like a bank.
itll all get cleared and he'll receive his money, along with the extra little bit that he baited from making this a bigger deal then it is.
view the rest of the comments →
SecondAmendment ago
I'm just an observer here, albeit a hard-working, educated one. I have to ask: DOES DAVID SEAMAN DO "STELLAR" WORK? If so, please tell us what "work" he does. Does he have an education? I've never heard or read about it anywhere. All I know is that I never heard of this whiny little millennial until I started following the Wikileaks story, which morphed into the Pizzagate story. And I saw everyone online talking about this supposedly cutting-edge journalist named David Seaman, so I watched his videos. But all he does is whine, repeat the same points over and over, and make accusations (which have not yet been proven in a court of law) against the big names linked to this scandal. If I were one of the targets of Seaman's rants, I'd surely sue for defamation (slander and libel). Of course, the lack of lawsuits against Seaman raises its own set of questions. Bottom line, though, whether what this kid says is true or false, he is off-putting to a great many people because (1) he's a whiner; (2) he doesn't do "work" on this; (3) he's constantly asking for donations from others; (4) he undermines his own credibility by outwardly admitting that he's a stoner (living in a state in which pot is not "legal" -- not that it's truly legal anywhere, given that the federal laws have not been repealed). Bottom line of the bottom line is that this guy seems to be quite unstable, a legend in his own mind, and not very credible. Yep, I said it. If this stuff of Pizzagate is real, I would suggest a far more stable and credible spokesman than this kid.
stop_the_pizza ago
He got this video to streissand and trend, so that's worth it. If you have a more stable and credible spokesman, fine, share it!
At this point he's the best I've seen. He's not only one who I've not heard make a single unsourcable claim. He also shares on gab.ai the evidence for things that people want to check.
PieInTheEye ago
I get your point, he is rather repetitive, but free speech is free speech.
If he's made specific allegations to an individual, it is their right to sue him ... but they don't work that way do they? If it went to court, and he counter sued based on a public interest defense, then dirty little secrets and facts might get investigated or subpoenas start flying around ... TPTB never do it this way, especially in regards to elite pedophile investigations ... they go to their elite friends in Alphabet, PayPal, etc, and attempt to apply pressure from a different angle, other than using the law, which would expose them to direct scrutiny. Just look at the Dutroux case, or the Franklin case ... the whistleblowers were leaned on from every possible direction, except in the actual court room.
In my opinion, this just highlights the high level connections that the Podesta's and David Brock have in D.C., and their ability to create their own extrajudicial mob-style campaign of silencing their critics. THEY are the ones who got political in their careers, and THEY are the ones who should be scrutinized publicly for their actions and affiliations. How did Alefantis make it into GQ's 50 most 'influential' people in Washington again? And why is the Washington Post, whose two ex-editors/journalist owners of Politics & Prose, leading the charge against Pizzagate investigators? THEY are the ones who have to answer for their actions, and Seaman has just been pointing that out--albeit a little bit whiney :)
Screwing with someones right to transfer money between peers, is a little bit more serious that someone having a personal gripe with the guy based on an actual slander. If Podesta and Brock have a problem, and are innocent, let them use the LAW, not dirty tricks to lean on this guys god given right to:
1) Speak his mind freely (free speech).
2) Have equal commercial service (ie, if a pizza shop now sells pizzas, but won't cater a gay wedding, they will lose their business license for refusing to allow service to certain customers. Why is this any different for PayPal as long as Seaman is not money laundering? ... or they haven't actually given him a legitimate reason based on illegal activities involving monetary transactions?) Cancelling small peer-to-peer transactions by his patrons is in my mind, a baseless refusal of service, based on his political positions, and is discrimination.
These are the people who want ALL monetary transactions to be electronic for goodness sakes. Imagine if I dropped you in a desert without any water and you died of dehydration: Did I violate your human rights? Are monetary transactions as important as water in today's world? PayPal needs to be lawfully regulated to ensure equal treatment of its consumers, just as everyone else is. They have no right to interfere in a personal gripe that some cabal has over this guys opinion. Seaman should be able to sue them for violating his human rights.
SecondAmendment ago
Excellent post; great points. I agree with everything you said. Yup, yup. The Pizza People will probably never sue him, because they would not want to subject themselves to the scrutiny that a lawsuit would involve. And yup, I agree that Seaman should file a lawsuit against Paypal if it froze his money. I hate Paypal -- always have -- so I never read its Terms of Service. I guess anyone whose funds have been frozen should read the TOS to see if they agreed to this kind of thing. I'd love to see lawsuits filed -- the truth always has a way of coming out in lawsuits. So I guess we'll see. In any case, thank you for this post, @PieInTheEye. Happy New Year.
PieInTheEye ago
Happy New Year to you too. Though I have a feeling it will be another year of leftist nutjobs destroying western civilization whilst proclaiming to be the victims. If the EU collapses though, it'll definitely be a happy year!
Azzipdoe ago
honestly couldn't agree more... maybe for a slightly diff reason, as im a firm believer in pizzagate and goverment involved pedophilia... considering they get caught all the time.
but this seaman guy makes pathetic videos, everything he talks about is recycled old info, he never talks about new very suspect leads, and that seems to almost do more damage then if he said nothing at all. he whines about donations being cut from youtube.. if he cared he'd be doing these vids merely to spread the word, not clickbait and make a few bucks. not to mention, MANY people lost ad revenue from youtube changing how it works, even hillary supporting but non political youtubers.
and for what its worth, i sell a lot of clothing online and ive donated to game developers on patreon using paypal, and ive been in similar situations with paypal.. its usually not a big deal, everything just needs to get verified. sometimes if you have a certain amount of money going in/out theyll lock your account for reasons of security.. just like a bank.
itll all get cleared and he'll receive his money, along with the extra little bit that he baited from making this a bigger deal then it is.