You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AreWeSure ago

You talk about crimes, but I see no evidence for the claims. The sale of Uranium One involved no crimes and multiple federal agencies confirmed it posed no threat to US security. You are using this for your claim of treason?

Joule is an American company. It is not controlled by Moscow or by Russian investors. And not a single word of that email concerns bribes.

You seem to alleging lobbying crimes, but it's not clear at all the specifics. The Panama Papers didn't reveal any crimes on behalf of the Podesta Group. Sberbank only became their client this year and they are publically registered as a lobbyist for Sberbank. See here

https://archive.is/ANo1b*

The issue they were hired to lobby on is US sanctions against the bank.

*Also there's a bonus there!

witch_doctor1 ago

Using your position as SOS to enrich yourself is absolutely 100% illegal. And if the Clinton Foundation wasn't about buying influence, why has the funding dried up now that HRC is at the back of the bus?

AreWeSure ago

There zero evidence of her enriching herself by using her position.

They were buying prestige, not influence. It was an ago thing.

witch_doctor1 ago

That's crazy talk. If you can't see that the Clinton's got rich by using their status, then you aren't really looking, because that is crystal clear and irrefutable.

"They were buying prestige, not influence. It was an ago thing." This is cognitive dissonance.

AreWeSure ago

You are making a vastly different claim from she used her office to enrich herself. You don't even seem to understand it.

There still hasn't been a single quid pro quo shown even after more emails revealed than any other figure in public life.

witch_doctor1 ago

I understand it perfectly...not one quid pro quo? I'll give you a bunch...Clinton Foundation donors get private meetings with Secretary of State if their donations are big enough. End of discussion on my part...not gonna feed the shills.

Cbradio ago

Hey, @witch_ doctor1 ( are we sure) is clearly a shill. Anytime, good leads, roaches come out of cracks to deny, minimize, mislead.

Even calls a corp, not Russian affiliated, links a archive and it states RUSSIAN SUBSIDIARY. And Podesta's jumping on the military privatizatiin of housing.

Monopolizing and privatizing resourcescand industries and hogging up govt staff, as poverty, jobs, all over USA are a huge escalating issues, and many other issues affecting quality of life and life duration.

ACTS like uranium grows on trees, and is as safe as apples.

Cognitive dissonance propaganda. This shill better train under Saul Alinsky more, very lousy at His agenda..hubba hubba forest gump jump jump!!