You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

MolochHunter ago

good lord, how do you go about claiming this Peter Lavenda is the author of the Necronomicon? HP Lovecraft wrote all of his stories which frequently referenced the Nec in the 20's and 30's - this Lavenda wasnt even born then

Did Lovecraft base his Necronomicon on actual rumours/knowledge or is it his fictional invention - which he said was authored by 'mad arab Abdul AlHazred or somesuch in the 8th Century

So this 1977 'edition' is just piggybacking on Lovecraft's mystique, and child trafficking / paedophilia is absent from Lovecraft's work - (I have read about 80% of his output)

So I question the relevance of this thread as much as i would were you to show a photo of podesta at a spiderman convention

OTPROPHET ago

good lord, how do you go about claiming this Peter Lavenda is the author of the Necronomicon?

By providing numerous linked references and referenced quotes that any literate asshole can click on or read?

Did you actually read my post?

CosmicChrist ago

You relating Podesta to more wierdo's is all well and good. Titling your post as you did is blatantly false, just like how you try and smear Crowely as a black magician and Satanist in other topics. You just don't know what you're talking about. Crowely in his own words admonished black magicians regularly, and Satanists, like Michael Aquino say Crowely wasn't like them, wasn't a black magician. Your ignorance of the Occult isn't doing your arguments any favors.

HashTagFU ago

Crowley was British Intelligence.

OTPROPHET ago

The book is real. How is this 'blatantly false"? Not only is it real, it has a long history in occult circles, as cited. Please read and learn. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Necronomicon. I've made no arguments, I've only presented sourced facts.

OTPROPHET ago

Nope. Levenda has a background in intelligence and is an expert in occult studies. He authored a very influential book, based on the Lovecraftian mythology but also adopted by occultists as legitimate. You can see the citation above from the Church of Satan about the book. The book is in fact well known in occult circles, and as I referenced above was actually evidence in a ritual murder case. And yes, the world kind of figured out your genius insight about 40 years ago when the book was published, thanks. Not sure of the importance, but its certainly interesting to see Podesta linked.

CosmicChrist ago

Even the qoutes you posted on your OP state the book Is fictional, and gets only "gullible suckers". The only thing the book in "well known for" in occult circles I being a work of fiction. Any fool who "adopts it as legitimate" is most likely one poor sorry excuse for an Occultist/magician.

I agree the podesta link is interesting, but look at the bigger picture here, you topic title at best is very misleading. The first thing I thought reading it was, "what? This guy has a picture of Podesta and Lovecraft?!".

Come on man.

OTPROPHET ago

Did you read the part about the book being used as evidence in a ritual murder? Did you read the part where I wrote about the book being a hoax? The book exists and has actual relevance in the occult community just because you don't know about for Pete's sake. Read what I fucking bothered to post. DId you read how the Church of Satan says, "this particular little black book is perfectly valid Satanic magic.". The title is perfectly legitimate, and Crowley was a pederast drug addled asshole who died in filth, fucked little boys, and gave us L.R. Hubbard. Fuck that guy.

CosmicChrist ago

Thanks for reaffirming how little you know about Crowley, but keep spouting nonsense like the MSM. I not going to keep trying to convince you, you're clearly not willing to look beyond the facade.

One thing we can agree on was Hubbard is a massive piece of shit, but again, not Crowely's fault. He didn't like Hubbard either.

Later.