You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

billybigrigger ago

Discussion on credibility of GWebb is irrelevant if all he's doing is pointing to or making connections between existing/open facts.

Firstly, it's clear he is knowledgeable in intelligence analysis (notice even the presentation style).

Secondly, it correct to assume most of what he is saying is "bullshit". He is trying to "cover" what he is saying, but also leaving clues. Probably de-risking his situation.

Thirdly it's impossible to know his intent, and whether he's just trying to serve a honey pot. But follow the facts, do your own research, come to your own conclusions, and all that "free thinking" stuff.

I think there is an underlying message to what he is saying. He's trying to tell one story, through another story. The "inconsistencies" are where the stories don't perfectly line up, and he has to "patch" them together. He also has to do it referencing existing factual information, so he can't be seen as revealing anything.

Fateswebb ago

I don't see how what George is doing could be considered a honey pot. A honey pot is set up to attract criminals, making them believe they are commuting a crime, but really the police or good people are tricking them. For instance a bait car, the term comes from setting out unsecured servers in hope of catching or analyzing the tactics used by a hacker.

billybigrigger ago

Generally honey pot or "honey dick" is a common term online for being baited with something you wish was true.

I don't think George is at all. In most of his videos he sounds quite nervous. Pretty good active if not legit. Also all of his info checks out. He's just connecting dots. Maybe the connections are legit, maybe they aren't.

chickyrogue ago

to me he is a very rational thinker and he digs and finds dots to connect its very comprehensive