You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

wecanhelp ago

@quantokitty, may I ask you to to add a tl;dr summary of your findings at the top of your post? Technically your submission doesn't violate rules, but it's difficult to make out the connection to Pizzagate.

quantokitty ago

It is? I thought "Gusifer" was a large part of it? And Patti Paule-Carres is Podesta's cousin. Yeah, I guess I can summarize it. I thought the link to the previous post would do that, but what do I know? Sure.

wecanhelp ago

We're only talking about a few sentences here, and it's much appreciated if you add those. It helps people process the complex information you're offering. Assuming that people understand why and how your findings are relevant is never a good thing, rule 1 is largely about this. We needed that so that readers don't need to spend a lot of time getting up to speed with a given topic or thread of investigation. Without this requirement, it's easy to exhaust users who are being bombarded with all kinds of complex information, including disinformation, as part of their efforts to understand and further the investigation. Thanks for understanding.

quantokitty ago

Done. Not a problem.

wecanhelp ago

Totally appreciated, it's so much easier to put your post in context this way.