for Legal Eagles in search of a screenplay.
This is really a door into the judicial system of pedophilia. unprecedented, unbelievable; legally, the whole thing is nanners. Epstein was open and shut. Collusion between Epstein's Dream Team and the State Atty's Office is open and shut. This is one of the burnt and useless scales on the dragon. the article is from May 22,'16 but it shows some real hardball.
The Shameful Way Feds Protected Convicted Pedophile Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=61529
"Epstein is not only a convicted pedophile, he is also at the heart of an extremely volatile case with an opposing attorney because of the extraordinary light conviction and sentencing leniency that he received. The court disposition in his case was simply unprecedented in U.S. history."
Also, Dershowitz (Harvard) made sure everyone associated with the case had immunity from future prosecution, and that the paperwork of the trial would be sequested for decades. Question: What would they have found had the prosecution conducted a full-blown investigation of Epstein? ....
"However, maybe more importantly, the case brings to light questions about what else would have been discovered if federal prosecutors had forgone the non-prosecution agreement and continued their investigation into the billionaire’s alleged illicit activity. Would anyone else have been implicated? What more could investigators have found?"
Answer: Their own pictures and phone numbers?
view the rest of the comments →
JrSlimss ago
I have a legal background and I wish people could understand that when outsiders ask what part of Pizzagate is actionable, this is the part that is actionable. We have identified victims, we have perpetrators, we have laws broken in how a case was settled, we have a statute of limitations that hasn't run, and we have things we can ask our congresspeople to do specifically.
First on my list? Ask Trey Gowdy, who so sits on the House Judiciary Committee which oversees the US Attorney General's Office, to review how US Attorneys like Acosta and Villafana can offer a non-prosecution agreement (aka plea bargain) to unidentified co-conspirators. If you were a lawyer, you would know this is a violation of Due Process and unenforceable because the defense lawyers on the case essentially can't represent people they don't know and don't have contact with. Then, we need Gowdy to ask who can still be prosecuted (not a stretch because international child trafficking has no statute of limitations under federal law). High on the list for prosecution are Ghislaine Maxwell and Jean Luc Brunel, both of which are identified in civil trials that followed as people that participated in the Epstein international sex trafficking ring. We also need to ask what charges weren't covered in the Epstein plea bargain and also that the US government throw its weight - through at least amicus briefs, but hopefully more - behind Virginia Roberts' civil case to have the Epstein plea bargain overturned for violations of the CVRA, as Stockman identified in the article. That way Epstein can really be prosecuted (to the extent double jeopardy doesn't apply).
On our end, we need to investigate all the people Alfredo Rodriguez identified in Epstein's Little Black Book. We don't have to investigate the whole book of people - though we can - just the ones he identified as people who would have information material to Epstein's operation by circling them. Here is the full list: http://pizzagate.wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#Additional_Material_Witnesses_or_Participants
For anyone looking for citations for all this info - the Pizzagate.Wiki covers all of Epstein in serious depth: http://pizzagate.wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein
Forgetmenot ago
I read in another forum not related to pizzagate: that the courts are not above public scrutiny. That we have a voice and should make sure that the they know the public is watching them. I think this idea is applicable pizzagate. Maybe as the public we should be calling our representatives and attorney generals demanding action and enforcement. Epsteins case is complicated and outrageous that he was allowed to get away with it. If the public had been active rather than complacent and distracted would the outcome had been any different ? There is really only one to know.
witch_doctor1 ago
Agreed. Hard evidence is going to be hard to come by for us. But making connections and making sure everyone involved gets their day in court is totally doable.