Please explain to me, why would the mother and her boyfriend coach the kids to say names and such specific details about their attackers, that could easily be proven to be false, such as tattoos, piercings or birthmarks on or around genitals? After the children's first interviews and the medical report that confirmed the abuse, why didn't they investigate those people? How can you possibly explain that? If the father and all the others are proven to be innocent (which they are not), where is the investigation about who abused the children, which, again, has been confirmed by the medical report. I know they accuse the mother and boyfriend that they made their children lie about their father, but they are not accused of sexual abuse, as far as I know.
Your are loud, but I still can't see the debunking.
view the rest of the comments →
trevor_reznik ago
Please explain to me, why would the mother and her boyfriend coach the kids to say names and such specific details about their attackers, that could easily be proven to be false, such as tattoos, piercings or birthmarks on or around genitals? After the children's first interviews and the medical report that confirmed the abuse, why didn't they investigate those people? How can you possibly explain that? If the father and all the others are proven to be innocent (which they are not), where is the investigation about who abused the children, which, again, has been confirmed by the medical report. I know they accuse the mother and boyfriend that they made their children lie about their father, but they are not accused of sexual abuse, as far as I know.
Your are loud, but I still can't see the debunking.