The most effective disinformation tells a basically true overall narrative, but mixes in fake evidence and nonsense to poison it.
Ted Gunderson was a COINTELPRO disinformant. COINTELPRO is an FBI program aimed at disrupting dissidents. His goal was actually to discredit claims of elite pedophile rings (and claims about 9/11) by introducing fake evidence, "poisoning the well," giving talks to groups of conspiracy researches to get them to adopt bad evidence and false "tinfoil hat" versions of their theories (e.g. "no plane at the Pentagon"), in order to discredit the true general claims (e.g. 9/11 = inside job) with the general public. He promoted the "Pentagon missile" disinfo, and he promoted the McMartin Preschool case as an example of an elite pedophile ring. The McMartin case is a well-known case of false allegations. The mother who made the initial allegations was crazy. She based it on her son having disrupted bowel movements. The jury exonerated the accused because video showed the interviewers basically coercing the toddlers into saying they were abused, using leading questions that violated California guidelines at the time. One of the kids sent an apology to the LA times as an adult. That case was the real case of false memories that spawned the whole concept.
Gunderson has been a promoter of just about every bogus theory one can come up with: Area 51, reptilians, FEMA internment camps, a United Nations army taking over the United States, chemtrails, "pineapple bombs" at Oklahoma, no-planes on 9/11...
You really didn't have to sticky this post with a 'Possible False Flag' you know, because the majority of people don't believe that Ted Gunderson is a disinformation agent like you do. The Johnny Gosch story is very relevant here and Ted helped his mother Noreen in her search for the truth. If only for this,The Franklin Cover up is a very important story and it should not be flagged as false. For the sake of Pizzagate and 'real news'.
the majority of people don't believe that Ted Gunderson is a disinformation agent like you do.
The majority of people have not researched Ted Gunderson at all, and therefore have no strong opinion on who he is. The purpose of the flair is to give users a heads-up so they have at least been warned. What you need to understand is that the most effective disinformation tells a basically true narrative, but poisons it with fake evidence and crazy, unfounded, or exaggerated aspects. That corrupts the investigation and ends up discrediting it.
So you also say there was a plane hitting the pentagon???
Would love to see some prove of that.
Otherwise you are proving yourself to be a disinformation agent.
There's a multilane highway that goes right by the Pentagon. Thousands of people saw the plane. That's why that particular bit of disinformation is so effective. Anyone who knows anything about DC will automatically see that you're woefully misinformed (and possible a lunatic) if you promote that claim. The real evidence on 9/11 has to do with the motive, the financing, and the foreknowledge (e.g. multiple FBI investigators knew the attack was coming, and had their investigations blocked), and possibly WTC 7 (not sure about that one, personally).
view the rest of the comments →
Millennial_Falcon ago
The most effective disinformation tells a basically true overall narrative, but mixes in fake evidence and nonsense to poison it.
Ted Gunderson was a COINTELPRO disinformant. COINTELPRO is an FBI program aimed at disrupting dissidents. His goal was actually to discredit claims of elite pedophile rings (and claims about 9/11) by introducing fake evidence, "poisoning the well," giving talks to groups of conspiracy researches to get them to adopt bad evidence and false "tinfoil hat" versions of their theories (e.g. "no plane at the Pentagon"), in order to discredit the true general claims (e.g. 9/11 = inside job) with the general public. He promoted the "Pentagon missile" disinfo, and he promoted the McMartin Preschool case as an example of an elite pedophile ring. The McMartin case is a well-known case of false allegations. The mother who made the initial allegations was crazy. She based it on her son having disrupted bowel movements. The jury exonerated the accused because video showed the interviewers basically coercing the toddlers into saying they were abused, using leading questions that violated California guidelines at the time. One of the kids sent an apology to the LA times as an adult. That case was the real case of false memories that spawned the whole concept.
Gunderson has been a promoter of just about every bogus theory one can come up with: Area 51, reptilians, FEMA internment camps, a United Nations army taking over the United States, chemtrails, "pineapple bombs" at Oklahoma, no-planes on 9/11...
Flairing as possible disinformation.
YingYangMom ago
You really didn't have to sticky this post with a 'Possible False Flag' you know, because the majority of people don't believe that Ted Gunderson is a disinformation agent like you do. The Johnny Gosch story is very relevant here and Ted helped his mother Noreen in her search for the truth. If only for this,The Franklin Cover up is a very important story and it should not be flagged as false. For the sake of Pizzagate and 'real news'.
Millennial_Falcon ago
The majority of people have not researched Ted Gunderson at all, and therefore have no strong opinion on who he is. The purpose of the flair is to give users a heads-up so they have at least been warned. What you need to understand is that the most effective disinformation tells a basically true narrative, but poisons it with fake evidence and crazy, unfounded, or exaggerated aspects. That corrupts the investigation and ends up discrediting it.
Letsdoit ago
So you also say there was a plane hitting the pentagon??? Would love to see some prove of that. Otherwise you are proving yourself to be a disinformation agent.
Millennial_Falcon ago
There's a multilane highway that goes right by the Pentagon. Thousands of people saw the plane. That's why that particular bit of disinformation is so effective. Anyone who knows anything about DC will automatically see that you're woefully misinformed (and possible a lunatic) if you promote that claim. The real evidence on 9/11 has to do with the motive, the financing, and the foreknowledge (e.g. multiple FBI investigators knew the attack was coming, and had their investigations blocked), and possibly WTC 7 (not sure about that one, personally).
idontlikesalmon ago
I've heard of people seeing the plane as well. My theory is that they used a hologram, otherwise those poles wouldn't be standing.