You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

euclidean ago

Am I the only one that thinks David Seaman is doing a poor job of documenting the ongoing research in this sub?

He has really only covered the basic/initial findings of pizzagate and has never done in-depth summaries of the new information we've compiled (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1517819)). His videos are just repetitive rambles instead of comprehensive summaries. He needs to get into the nitty gritty details and he has avoided doing so thus far.

Here is an example of a superbly made video which David should strive for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCzgogEQMQs (This video isn't strictly pizzagate related - I'm demonstrating the style of video) These types of videos present actual information with pictures/evidence/infographics and are far more structured than someone rambling on his webcam.

He is an investigative journalist, the most credible researcher we have on our side, yet he simply turns on his webcam, and discusses pizzagate in the most generic fashion, instead of creating 'documentary-style' analysis videos of all current and up-to date research.

SChalice ago

He seems a little narcissistic but I think anyone who makes videos of themselves must be.