Am I the only one that thinks David Seaman is doing a poor job of documenting the ongoing research in this sub?
He has really only covered the basic/initial findings of pizzagate and has never done in-depth summaries of the new information we've compiled (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1517819)). His videos are just repetitive rambles instead of comprehensive summaries. He needs to get into the nitty gritty details and he has avoided doing so thus far.
Here is an example of a superbly made video which David should strive for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCzgogEQMQs (This video isn't strictly pizzagate related - I'm demonstrating the style of video) These types of videos present actual information with pictures/evidence/infographics and are far more structured than someone rambling on his webcam.
He is an investigative journalist, the most credible researcher we have on our side, yet he simply turns on his webcam, and discusses pizzagate in the most generic fashion, instead of creating 'documentary-style' analysis videos of all current and up-to date research.
I think its a combo of what is feasible now and risking the comfort zones. Limits on advocacy occur as go deeper. But do think we need to create group YouTube shows that do not show faces, mirror them, etc. Also, any techies that can create new internet on dig broadband/frequencies, social.platforms like YouTube? I know he has moved to a dif site, just thinking ahead.
Cbradio internet/social sites?
Changing pizzagate to another phrase, let the Dilbert have their untrademarked phrase for they want what they want, when they want it.
No sharing in the sandbox, regressed adults.
view the rest of the comments →
euclidean ago
Am I the only one that thinks David Seaman is doing a poor job of documenting the ongoing research in this sub?
He has really only covered the basic/initial findings of pizzagate and has never done in-depth summaries of the new information we've compiled (https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1517819)). His videos are just repetitive rambles instead of comprehensive summaries. He needs to get into the nitty gritty details and he has avoided doing so thus far.
Here is an example of a superbly made video which David should strive for: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sCzgogEQMQs (This video isn't strictly pizzagate related - I'm demonstrating the style of video) These types of videos present actual information with pictures/evidence/infographics and are far more structured than someone rambling on his webcam.
He is an investigative journalist, the most credible researcher we have on our side, yet he simply turns on his webcam, and discusses pizzagate in the most generic fashion, instead of creating 'documentary-style' analysis videos of all current and up-to date research.
Cbradio ago
I think its a combo of what is feasible now and risking the comfort zones. Limits on advocacy occur as go deeper. But do think we need to create group YouTube shows that do not show faces, mirror them, etc. Also, any techies that can create new internet on dig broadband/frequencies, social.platforms like YouTube? I know he has moved to a dif site, just thinking ahead.
Cbradio internet/social sites?
Changing pizzagate to another phrase, let the Dilbert have their untrademarked phrase for they want what they want, when they want it. No sharing in the sandbox, regressed adults.