Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents
Serial killers being caught due to parking tickets is why I like the idea of being open to all kinds of information, so long as it can be reasonably connected to the phenomena that is being exposed by pizzagate. I've said similar here
This whole thing is so much bigger than a series of pizza shops, but that is where it started.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result
I'm worried about it becoming this and also a Mccarthy witch hunt.
It's difficult to walk the very thin line between these difficulties.
Ensuring the community is able to express itself how it chooses is my hope that these rules can support.
McCarthy never ran a "witch hunt" despite what Hollywood movies might try to tell you. Did you know that McCarthy was very effecting in exposing people who were undermining our country by spreading propaganda through Hollywood? He was a pizzagate investigator before pizzagate. His name has been dragged through the mud by the same media who have been dragging our name through the mud.
I do understand this perspective and agree the reality of the event is most likely not as presented by the media since.
I use the term to mean the common use version, which is the one where people are accused of a thing because it's easy to get rid of your neighbor by simply accusing them of being a commie.
Salem witch trials, mccarthyism, islamophobia, anti-semite, racis, misogynist - whatever label used it is a often used tactic to undermine legitimate investigation, or to discredit legitimate positions.
This something I want to make sure everyone is aware of.
The very position of your comment advocates for this by pointing out how someone's work was corrupted by people using this tactic to discredit the original intent.
view the rest of the comments →
VieBleu ago
Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Serial killers being caught due to parking tickets is why I like the idea of being open to all kinds of information, so long as it can be reasonably connected to the phenomena that is being exposed by pizzagate.
I've said similar here
This whole thing is so much bigger than a series of pizza shops, but that is where it started.
I'm worried about it becoming this and also a Mccarthy witch hunt.
It's difficult to walk the very thin line between these difficulties.
Ensuring the community is able to express itself how it chooses is my hope that these rules can support.
FormerBaltimoreRes ago
McCarthy never ran a "witch hunt" despite what Hollywood movies might try to tell you. Did you know that McCarthy was very effecting in exposing people who were undermining our country by spreading propaganda through Hollywood? He was a pizzagate investigator before pizzagate. His name has been dragged through the mud by the same media who have been dragging our name through the mud.
Ann Coulter summarizes this well
http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2007-11-07.html
VictorSteinerDavion ago
I do understand this perspective and agree the reality of the event is most likely not as presented by the media since.
I use the term to mean the common use version, which is the one where people are accused of a thing because it's easy to get rid of your neighbor by simply accusing them of being a commie.
Salem witch trials, mccarthyism, islamophobia, anti-semite, racis, misogynist - whatever label used it is a often used tactic to undermine legitimate investigation, or to discredit legitimate positions.
This something I want to make sure everyone is aware of.
The very position of your comment advocates for this by pointing out how someone's work was corrupted by people using this tactic to discredit the original intent.