Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents
Serial killers being caught due to parking tickets is why I like the idea of being open to all kinds of information, so long as it can be reasonably connected to the phenomena that is being exposed by pizzagate. I've said similar here
This whole thing is so much bigger than a series of pizza shops, but that is where it started.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result
I'm worried about it becoming this and also a Mccarthy witch hunt.
It's difficult to walk the very thin line between these difficulties.
Ensuring the community is able to express itself how it chooses is my hope that these rules can support.
Serial killers being caught due to parking tickets is why I like the idea of being open to all kinds of information
Yes, but in that case there was actually evidence of a series of crimes being committed. That is not the case here. Also the parking ticket clue was followed up on because there was an eyewitness who saw a man pass her and then her shots 5 min later. She also saw the car with the parking ticket.
You're actually stating my point better than I could.
While we may not be at the point where this kind of thing can happen, by helping people be more aware my hope is we can bring about an environment where some one can feel it necessary to report something that might break the whole thing open.
Then let me state it this way. The difference between the two cases is the presence of real crimes and victims in one and imagined crimes and victims in another.
view the rest of the comments →
VieBleu ago
Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
Serial killers being caught due to parking tickets is why I like the idea of being open to all kinds of information, so long as it can be reasonably connected to the phenomena that is being exposed by pizzagate.
I've said similar here
This whole thing is so much bigger than a series of pizza shops, but that is where it started.
I'm worried about it becoming this and also a Mccarthy witch hunt.
It's difficult to walk the very thin line between these difficulties.
Ensuring the community is able to express itself how it chooses is my hope that these rules can support.
AreWeSure ago
Yes, but in that case there was actually evidence of a series of crimes being committed. That is not the case here. Also the parking ticket clue was followed up on because there was an eyewitness who saw a man pass her and then her shots 5 min later. She also saw the car with the parking ticket.
VictorSteinerDavion ago
You're actually stating my point better than I could.
While we may not be at the point where this kind of thing can happen, by helping people be more aware my hope is we can bring about an environment where some one can feel it necessary to report something that might break the whole thing open.
AreWeSure ago
Then let me state it this way. The difference between the two cases is the presence of real crimes and victims in one and imagined crimes and victims in another.