Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
Also people have different styles of thinking. Many are stimulated by and get leads from seeing a wide range of possibilities.
It's like a huge jigsaw puzzle with people working on different sections of it, and passing over piecse that seem to belong elsewhere. You can't put one predefined set of pieces on the table to work on or you make it almost impossible for the puzzle to come together.
Isn't what George Webb doing putting together scattered pieces and isn't that inspiring people to look not just deeper but larger, to see patterns? You can't see patterns without all the pieces out there to consider and try different configurations and even start again and retry them.
view the rest of the comments →
VieBleu ago
Many a cop has acted on a hunch, many an investigation has started with "associates and habits, hobbies and interests" as a way to refine a picture of a perp.
Pizzagate as a scandal sprang from a culture, a subculture to be exact, and anything relating to that subculture must be allowed to be SPECULATED ON AND THEORIZED ABOUT. That means that art, people, food, habits, family, slang, partying, socializing, jokes, music, religion, politics, names, travel, affairs, pets you name it- the sum total of human activity relating to any person who is part of a pizzagate association must be able to be included in the discussion.
Random arrests, the history of pedophilia, magic, satanism, psychedelics, the CIA/FBI/DNC/RNC/and NGO's, worldwide slavery, mind control and pedophilia operations, organ trafficking, drug trafficking, worldwide trade operations and even animal poaching might all need to be brought into the conversation to understand the whole picture.
What to do? i would say allow more than less, and only if it really smells bad, which is a judgment of taste, take action. Are we at risk of not having enough pixels? aren't tough law enforcement investigations often solved by obscure out of the way incidents and connections that almost nobody noticed? I say go broad and leave the most you can to be archived, searched and revisited.
This isn't the Warren Commission, created to get the best sanitized result. Right?
Is it? Then, let 'er rip.
naturehelps ago
Absolutely.
Also people have different styles of thinking. Many are stimulated by and get leads from seeing a wide range of possibilities.
It's like a huge jigsaw puzzle with people working on different sections of it, and passing over piecse that seem to belong elsewhere. You can't put one predefined set of pieces on the table to work on or you make it almost impossible for the puzzle to come together.
Isn't what George Webb doing putting together scattered pieces and isn't that inspiring people to look not just deeper but larger, to see patterns? You can't see patterns without all the pieces out there to consider and try different configurations and even start again and retry them.
Put it all out there.