Maybe it would be useful to organise the subverse by flair? So people could flair their own post as things like: Podesta/Alefantis, Clinton Foundation, North America Connections, Europe Connections, Middle East Connections, Africa Connections, Oceania Connections, South/Central America Connections, Official Law Enforcement Investigations, MSM Cover Up, Current Breaking News, Tangential Pedophile info/stories. Or something like that, so that people can filter by the area they are working on, but also can see everything else in case something in the Tangential Pedophile section sparks an idea or a new lead etc?
That way the mods have less work hopefully and there isn't the risk that some crucial but random unexpected breakthrough from a seemingly unrelated pedo post gets missed? Just an idea!
This is a great idea. Even if there are only limited formal flairs, requiring titles to begin as you've said will help people sort content. There can be some "approved list" of title starters. In order to keep from potentially excluding seemingly irrelevant posts, "Misc Suspects", "Misc County", "Misc Satanic", etc. can be used as title starters. If solid connections are missing, "Misc" should be used. I don't think requiring titles like this is asking too much.
Pizzagate is the citizens investigation of pedophilia and child trafficking by the global elite.
I understand what you are saying as it pertains to the financial field, however I disagree in relation to the content we are dealing with here. I work in the legal field, and based on my experience, organizing evidence into an usable manner is imperative to developing a case. Sometimes I have complex cases that require seemingly irrelevant information to be loosely sorted into a catchall category if and until it becomes relevant.
Several subs that flow together is a good option, although I think a good amount of organization can be accomplished through titles which would make searching effective.
I also see a lot of people upset about posts being "deleted. I don't know if it's too much trouble, but maybe a 24 hour hold can be put on new posts before they are moved to the "deleted posts" place. Since the posts aren't actually deleted, they are easily obtainable by anyone who choses to pursue looking into that content. If possible, a 24 hour hold before they are moved would allow most people to see them prior to.
I do not agree with focusing on Alefantis, Podesta, etc. I believe this is much bigger than that, and here is why. Maybe I am reading too much into this, but I think it is telling:
"What would happen if they could hack into an email account of a
public figure and find connections to El Chapo? What if they found
bank accounts shared by public officials and cartel members? What if
websites they targeted had names and addresses of officials in any
country linked to child porno rings? I just think that we need to
look at what Anonymous could do to change their MO, and become more
effective than just shutting down websites."
Notice it says "names and officials in ANY country linked to child porno rings."
I believe the "deleted" name for the posts shuttled to the public accessable file is mis - named , poor grammer.
You have to get grammar straight first as all logic is built upon it. They are obviously not "deleted" as they are still there for perusal.
If it had been named properly , I wouldn't have wasted my time arguing about it.
As I contend: a legal case will never get anywhere. Look at the past. Look at how many moles these people have.. Look at how they have 100% control of the Media and have the public "by the balls" In court all you need is a few people to lie about you and set up your conviction. How many liars do you think are involved in this?!
We have to multiply the glasses /magnifiers looking at this, multiply the eyes looking at this by the scores, thousands, tens of thousands and millions.
Looking toward a legal case, without doing the "multiplying of eyes on the subject " is a dead end. And anyone advocating that, to me, is someone who is unnecessarily narrowing and perhaps even stalling the investigation / project.
Another point I made earlier, and you should know that if you are a lawyer - is that the legal system is seeded with corrupt judges. The lawyers are in total league with monied institutions and powers. To dream that a legal case will ever fly, especially in the present climate, is "pie in the sky" and is more imaginative than the most outlier data people connect to "Pizzagate"
I did not say I am a lawyer, I said I work in the legal field.
I agree with much of what you say, especially in terms of the "deleted" content, that comment was not directed at you in particular. I've seen much confusion here over "deleted" posts, I think the place they go should be more easily findable. I made no mention of what content should be moved there, as I stated I think the scope of this is vast. My comments were purely pertaining to organization, which will make it easier to sort content, limiting the need/confusion over moving submissions.
As for content, there isn't much I would send to that place personally. I would rather see everything than to miss something important.
view the rest of the comments →
SpikyAube ago
Maybe it would be useful to organise the subverse by flair? So people could flair their own post as things like: Podesta/Alefantis, Clinton Foundation, North America Connections, Europe Connections, Middle East Connections, Africa Connections, Oceania Connections, South/Central America Connections, Official Law Enforcement Investigations, MSM Cover Up, Current Breaking News, Tangential Pedophile info/stories. Or something like that, so that people can filter by the area they are working on, but also can see everything else in case something in the Tangential Pedophile section sparks an idea or a new lead etc?
That way the mods have less work hopefully and there isn't the risk that some crucial but random unexpected breakthrough from a seemingly unrelated pedo post gets missed? Just an idea!
Iyd10 ago
This is a great idea. Even if there are only limited formal flairs, requiring titles to begin as you've said will help people sort content. There can be some "approved list" of title starters. In order to keep from potentially excluding seemingly irrelevant posts, "Misc Suspects", "Misc County", "Misc Satanic", etc. can be used as title starters. If solid connections are missing, "Misc" should be used. I don't think requiring titles like this is asking too much.
Pizzagate is the citizens investigation of pedophilia and child trafficking by the global elite.
samhara ago
I like the summary of the term 'Pizzagate"
samhara ago
I don't like "Misc" as a title. It doesn't say anything. Also encourages hodge - podge. I also learned not to use "misc. " in accounting school.
Iyd10 ago
I understand what you are saying as it pertains to the financial field, however I disagree in relation to the content we are dealing with here. I work in the legal field, and based on my experience, organizing evidence into an usable manner is imperative to developing a case. Sometimes I have complex cases that require seemingly irrelevant information to be loosely sorted into a catchall category if and until it becomes relevant.
Several subs that flow together is a good option, although I think a good amount of organization can be accomplished through titles which would make searching effective.
I also see a lot of people upset about posts being "deleted. I don't know if it's too much trouble, but maybe a 24 hour hold can be put on new posts before they are moved to the "deleted posts" place. Since the posts aren't actually deleted, they are easily obtainable by anyone who choses to pursue looking into that content. If possible, a 24 hour hold before they are moved would allow most people to see them prior to.
I do not agree with focusing on Alefantis, Podesta, etc. I believe this is much bigger than that, and here is why. Maybe I am reading too much into this, but I think it is telling:
(10/24/11 Stratfor Email Re: Anonymous Potential)
https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/27/2758588_re-ct-anonymous-potential-.html
"What would happen if they could hack into an email account of a public figure and find connections to El Chapo? What if they found bank accounts shared by public officials and cartel members? What if websites they targeted had names and addresses of officials in any country linked to child porno rings? I just think that we need to look at what Anonymous could do to change their MO, and become more effective than just shutting down websites."
Notice it says "names and officials in ANY country linked to child porno rings."
samhara ago
I believe the "deleted" name for the posts shuttled to the public accessable file is mis - named , poor grammer. You have to get grammar straight first as all logic is built upon it. They are obviously not "deleted" as they are still there for perusal.
If it had been named properly , I wouldn't have wasted my time arguing about it.
As I contend: a legal case will never get anywhere. Look at the past. Look at how many moles these people have.. Look at how they have 100% control of the Media and have the public "by the balls" In court all you need is a few people to lie about you and set up your conviction. How many liars do you think are involved in this?!
We have to multiply the glasses /magnifiers looking at this, multiply the eyes looking at this by the scores, thousands, tens of thousands and millions.
Looking toward a legal case, without doing the "multiplying of eyes on the subject " is a dead end. And anyone advocating that, to me, is someone who is unnecessarily narrowing and perhaps even stalling the investigation / project.
Another point I made earlier, and you should know that if you are a lawyer - is that the legal system is seeded with corrupt judges. The lawyers are in total league with monied institutions and powers. To dream that a legal case will ever fly, especially in the present climate, is "pie in the sky" and is more imaginative than the most outlier data people connect to "Pizzagate"
Iyd10 ago
I did not say I am a lawyer, I said I work in the legal field.
I agree with much of what you say, especially in terms of the "deleted" content, that comment was not directed at you in particular. I've seen much confusion here over "deleted" posts, I think the place they go should be more easily findable. I made no mention of what content should be moved there, as I stated I think the scope of this is vast. My comments were purely pertaining to organization, which will make it easier to sort content, limiting the need/confusion over moving submissions.
As for content, there isn't much I would send to that place personally. I would rather see everything than to miss something important.
samhara ago
I agree completely.