DON'T believe this for a second. All the witnesses in the case reported of only seeing one man. These perfectly drawn police mug shots are too convenient. I am not saying Podesta wasn't involved, but I am also NOT saying that there parents are innocent. There were many discrepancies in their stories and contradictions. I think this is a red herring, these shots are there to either keep the Podesta in line or who knows they may throw them under the bus to cover up the immense wheel of corruption and child trafficking.
No matter what they said, neither of these sketches were based on "witness recollection". No "witness recollection" would be detailed enough to even catch Tony's mole. No, this was law enforcements way of pointing the finger at the culprits they weren't allowed to arrest (I am sure the police were absolutely irate about not being allowed to prosecute). Sketches based on "witness recollection" that are practically photographs of the Podesta brothers.
How do you think it makes sense that they're "not allowed" to go after the Podestas, and aren't "allowed" to say there were two men or how old they were -- instead they were I guess "forced" to say it was one man 20-40 years old -- but are "allowed" to release pictures of them?
view the rest of the comments →
Aysemari ago
DON'T believe this for a second. All the witnesses in the case reported of only seeing one man. These perfectly drawn police mug shots are too convenient. I am not saying Podesta wasn't involved, but I am also NOT saying that there parents are innocent. There were many discrepancies in their stories and contradictions. I think this is a red herring, these shots are there to either keep the Podesta in line or who knows they may throw them under the bus to cover up the immense wheel of corruption and child trafficking.
contrary_mma_hipster ago
No matter what they said, neither of these sketches were based on "witness recollection". No "witness recollection" would be detailed enough to even catch Tony's mole. No, this was law enforcements way of pointing the finger at the culprits they weren't allowed to arrest (I am sure the police were absolutely irate about not being allowed to prosecute). Sketches based on "witness recollection" that are practically photographs of the Podesta brothers.
comeonpeople ago
How do you think it makes sense that they're "not allowed" to go after the Podestas, and aren't "allowed" to say there were two men or how old they were -- instead they were I guess "forced" to say it was one man 20-40 years old -- but are "allowed" to release pictures of them?
Forgetmenot ago
Diplomatic immunity would be one theory
comeonpeople ago
Diplomatic immunity would prevent them from being arrested and prosecuted, not prevent them from being named as the suspects.
Nor would it force them to pretend the efits are of one suspect in his 20s to 40s, instead of two suspects in their 50s to 60s.
Forgetmenot ago
Makes sense.