Absolutely disgusting. How is this kind of stuff allowed? Look how many views they all have. Almost all the thumbnails look sexual too.
Edit: I see many of you saying it's just the default file name, nothing more and I get that, but what exactly explains all these views? I'm sure there are bots involved, but why? I just find it strange that these videos that are usual only around 30 seconds are getting anywhere from 100k to 1 million views. It's pretty strange.
view the rest of the comments →
bopper ago
No not just any content appeals to them. Not all of it is 'irrelevant,' unless you have no moral compass. Actually yes, if it was up to me I would indeed ban all pics. pageants, gymnastics, etc. that featured young girls scantily clad and hypersexualized. Call me a puritan. A dreamer. Call it gagging free speech. I call it a beautiful thing. Do you get off to this stuff, just curious?
AnarchyChad ago
It's pretty gross, but you're getting into thought crime territory. It's anti-christ Ian that's for sure. Only God can judge a man's thoughts, and he will - man can only judge another man's actions.
There's good reason for it too. Once you support thought crime against another, you'll see yourself charged of it. It's always the same story throughout history... they always have a 'Good reason' to start an unjust law, that will come around and bite the people in the ass.
Let's focus on what really matters, trying to limit victimization of innocent kids. You can't really stop creeps from looking at kids in weird way other than teaching your kids to be safe and keeping them away from that people. Let's also not forget most victims have shitty parents or no parents - and just being a parent is the best defense.
bopper ago
I'm not interested in thoughts, I'm talking about objective things. (Which tempt to evil thoughts and actions.) I completely understand Orwellian 'dogma,' and dislike the term hate crime for example (speech is not property as one person put it). My 'ideal' community is the early puritan new englanders (theocracy) which is not going to happen in my lifetime.
"Let's focus on what really matters, trying to limit victimization of innocent kids. You can't really stop creeps from looking at kids in weird way other than teaching your kids to be safe and keeping them away from that people. Let's also not forget most victims have shitty parents or no parents - and just being a parent is the best defense."
Well put/said, I'm a parent and I couldn't agree more. Unfortunately, this isn't the 1950's, when it comes to parenting, but then no period has been exemplary. And today ... seems hopeless. (But it's not.) Thanks for the kind reply.
AnarchyChad ago
Thank you for the kind words, and same for you. I probably agree with you to a point, I'm conservative, so I'm not against some social protections. Problem is morality seems to be all over the place in today's world and one man's morality is another man's sins. I think there are big things going on in our society and it all relates back to people not having a solid moral compass. That's how SJWs get away with saying racial justice is 'just', when we all know that is not Anglo-Saxon morality and is anti-American; but none the less morality is so muddy today, that people can get away with it and no one can argue against them.
I've noticed now more than ever that people 'use the lord's name in vain' ALOT. Not people saying 'God dammit'(I don't think God gives a damn if you cuss), but people pretending that God would want them to do something, but they can't back up their claim with any theological authority. People pretend like killing their babies is the will of God. They can't just commit one sin, they have to commit another sin, by pretending its not a sin. I'm not even Christian, but I can tell most these people are definitely not either... I'm actually being driven to Christianity based on all these people. If we can't even agree on morality we are fucked. We need to bring back Christian morality as the overall source l, as that's how we got here, and it sure in the hell beats where we are going.
bopper ago
Well the country has just devolved so much morally. As with all nations, there's an ebb and flow, and sometimes a civilization just crumbles under the weight of it's sins, never to arise again. "Righteousness exalteth a nation: but sin is a reproach to any people." We need a spiritual revival, and turn back to the scriptures and to God in Christ. Men must rule their own hearts, it has to come from within. You can't legislate morality.
Most churches today are washed out and are part of the problem. They imbibe and focus on 'psuedo-sins' such as homophobe, racist, etc. (I think you touched on that. cultural Marxism, It's sinful these days to be proud of being white!). Sin is defined by the Reformers (of the Great Reformation) as a "want of conformity unto, or any transgression of, the law of God' (ten commandments). Which leaves us all wanting, as all have sinned. Thus the reason for the sacrifice of Christ, which was a bloody human sacrifice, the only legit one. People who practice human sacrifice today are attempting to atone for their sins, in a perverted, unlawful way, a devilish way, and rejecting the real historical one.
Check out our true history, the puritans who founded the country, and their origin, there will be your true Christianity, and you might be shocked at just how strict they were, and how far we've fallen. We need to call upon the one true God and ask for national forgiveness. (Trump's mom was a member of a very strict Scottish 'puritan' church, and Trump remembers some of her teachings, and supposedly Trump has had a change of heart on some pertinent spiritual things, so maybe there's hope, you never know.) I have a youtube link if you want it (his puritan roots). Sorry I've rambled on too much.
AnarchyChad ago
No your not rambling, I pretty much agreed with every word. I used to look up to movie stars and athletes (like most young people of today), but now I'm looking up to people like George Washington, Henry Ford, General Patton, etc. They all where pretty puritan. I do agree that it has to come from within and you can't really regulate morality outside of common law - which implies an actual crime against another person. But I think they where on to something. It's not just about being a good student of Christ or w/e, but about restraining the immediate gratification monkey inside all of us that seems to be the basis of so many sins, because people have not trained their 'inner monkey' and are slaves to wimsicle emotions and motivations.
I've been limiting my internet use, barely watch tv, work out four days a week, eat pretty healthy, don't watch porn, etc. I think these puritans where on to something. It's not about restricting actions for control or religious dogma, it's about freeing yourself from you 'monkey brain' and allowing yourself to be the captain of your own ship which will propel you to knew heights. The only difference I have with puritans, is that I think balance is key - and I think it's okay to drink, smoke, etc - as long as it is minimal and doesn't effect the rest of your life.
I think the battle between good and evil is in every man's heart. I think the main way I can fight evil in this world is to fight it in myself. If I achieve that to a moderate degree I think it will be spread into my environment by my conventions and motivated actions to do good. I don't really preach my philosophy to anyone, I just live my philosophy. That's how I was introduced to it. No one preached it to me, I just saw a bunch of people I really admired and started to realize a lot of them had similar views of life - and how I should probably adopt those views and behaviors in my own life. Maybe I can inspire the same in someone else in the future - even if it's just a sibling, or nephew, or child, etc.
bopper ago
I think you're on to something - that 'inner monkey' is real, it's called 'original sin' or 'total depravity of man.' You should research John Calvin, Martin Luther, there's so many. The idea of the gospel is that the spirit of God is given inwardly to a Christian to enable one to overcome their naturally evil heart (which we don't want to admit to having). Surprisingly the puritans did smoke tobacco and they, as some think, were not against alcoholic drinks (that came from the Southern Baptists, being self-righteous). Obviously they did frown on drunkenness. Wow, sounds like you're on the right track, I wish the very best for you.
AnarchyChad ago
Thanks, same to you. I read C.S. Lewis' mere Christianity and it was really good, but too much to digest in one read, I'll have to visit it again and again I'm sure. Next books are probably gonna be Crime and Punishment, and Maps of Meaning.... I should probably read the Bible too, but it's too easy to confuse stuff, so for now gonna stick with those other things.