Where is the actual source article in which Kim LaCapria wrote of Harry Potter and described her lifestyle? Since the claim is that she has written these things, you will need to document these with links. Otherwise, these claims are easily described as "fake news."
I am not so sure. I looked and could not find the source documents. If she wrote these things (Harry Potter, etc.), where is it? I can find nothing else on it in a search,
But the website's own troubles and the intriguing choice of who carries out its 'fact checks' are revealed by DailyMail.com, as one of its main contributors is disclosed to be a former sex-blogger who called herself 'Vice Vixen'
What is the source for this claim? We have to be careful as CTR will deliberately plant fake claims into this platform to discredit. Just try to trace the claims in the article and see if you can find them documented or substantiated anywhere outside of the words in the article. I am 100% confident that this pizzagate controversy is real and goes to the highest levels in government, but we need to be careful in what we identify as truth (because it supports us in some way) as those fighting us will jump on anything that can be found to be not true
No sign of pedophile Harry Potter fanfiction on the site. This is not a satisfactory source. I 100% agree with @reasonedandinformed that we need to take our sources very seriously, and so far this submission fails to do so.
Snopes is a well-known "debuking" website, so if you've got Snopes under control, you've handled many of the lazy skeptics out there who do possess the amount of critical thinking to question mainstream media, but don't (yet) possess the amount to question a seemingly anti-mainstream fact-checking website like Snopes. Snopes is apparently strategically placed "mainstream non-mainstream media", to help those who control the news reach even further than regular mainstream media. Does this help?
view the rest of the comments →
reasonedandinformed ago
Where is the actual source article in which Kim LaCapria wrote of Harry Potter and described her lifestyle? Since the claim is that she has written these things, you will need to document these with links. Otherwise, these claims are easily described as "fake news."
terrordactyl ago
daily mail is sensationalist but it it is an msm rag that usually has enough evidence in their journalism. This is legit.
reasonedandinformed ago
I am not so sure. I looked and could not find the source documents. If she wrote these things (Harry Potter, etc.), where is it? I can find nothing else on it in a search,
terrordactyl ago
um its in the article: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4042194/Facebook-fact-checker-arbitrate-fake-news-accused-defrauding-website-pay-prostitutes-staff-includes-escort-porn-star-Vice-Vixen-domme.html
reasonedandinformed ago
The article you cite lacks sources. One example:
What is the source for this claim? We have to be careful as CTR will deliberately plant fake claims into this platform to discredit. Just try to trace the claims in the article and see if you can find them documented or substantiated anywhere outside of the words in the article. I am 100% confident that this pizzagate controversy is real and goes to the highest levels in government, but we need to be careful in what we identify as truth (because it supports us in some way) as those fighting us will jump on anything that can be found to be not true
terrordactyl ago
theres a screen capture of her blog in the article. Direct link: https://vicevixen.wordpress.com/ archive link: http://archive.is/GhfvO
wecanhelp ago
No sign of pedophile Harry Potter fanfiction on the site. This is not a satisfactory source. I 100% agree with @reasonedandinformed that we need to take our sources very seriously, and so far this submission fails to do so.
terrordactyl ago
Ok let us say you're right. Why what be the reason to run a disinformation OP on snopes? I don't see the logic behind it. Help me out.
wecanhelp ago
Snopes is a well-known "debuking" website, so if you've got Snopes under control, you've handled many of the lazy skeptics out there who do possess the amount of critical thinking to question mainstream media, but don't (yet) possess the amount to question a seemingly anti-mainstream fact-checking website like Snopes. Snopes is apparently strategically placed "mainstream non-mainstream media", to help those who control the news reach even further than regular mainstream media. Does this help?
reasonedandinformed ago
Good analysis.
wecanhelp ago
Thanks.