So I came upon this item:
http://archive.is/NNTn9
Summarization: A vehement denunciation of Proposition K, a bill that SF was asked to vote on in 2008. The measure that was written by the Erotic Service Providers Union that essentially would: Direct "San Francisco Police Department and the District Attorney’s office to refuse to enforce the State of California’s prostitution laws. These sections include the laws used to investigate and prosecute traffickers and those involved in exploiting children. Non-enforcement of these laws would put all of us at risk, and send an invitation out to pimps, traffickers, and johns." In other words, it would have been open season on women and children. The pimps and traffickers would have won the day.
This legislation has an interesting history. It started in 1994, when the "San Francisco Board of Supervisors established a Task Force on Prostitution, which recommended in a 1996 report that the City decriminalize prostitution." Here's the link for for this fact.
http://archive.is/QsT49
It was this report that was responsible for removing massage parlors from being under police control and putting them under the jurisdiction of Public Health. Yeah, that's why there are so many and why the police don't do anything about them. I'm thrilled about that--not.
Re: Proposition K, there was an outcry as proven by the ton of blogs and articles urging the measure to be defeated. The whole notion of "erotic workers" wanting this is ridiculous. If someone really were a victim of human trafficking, does one suppose the pimps, traffickers, and handlers really sat down and asked the women, children, and boys they were raping what they wanted? Yeah, I think not. The thing that really confused me was who was pushing this proposition? I kept reading article after article that there was some kind of "war" going on in the democratic ranks. They kept referring to this "other" democratic party that supported it since the mayor did not. I plowed through the press coverage and was unable to locate what nutcase thought this would be a good idea. So I kept going until I hit pay dirt.
http://archive.is/6fi3b
This article begins by saying: "In 2006 the Council of Europe reported worldwide sex trafficking had reached “‘epidemic proportions’ over the past decade,” according to the Associated Press." It goes onto say: "It is widely acknowledged that legalized prostitution exacerbates the problem." I keep reading on and there it is!!!
The Family Research Council reported yesterday:
Believe it or not, one of the few groups to endorse Proposition K (apart from the Erotic Service Providers Union) is the San Francisco Democratic Party – of which Nancy Pelosi is a member…
It's really frightening. This has been going on a long time and is an insidious, festering cancer. With help from the think tanks, they'll weaken and eventually come up with some half-witted excuse that will delude the masses into letting human traffickers have their way with no interference from the law. Now that our eyes our wide open, keep digging and get these vipers out of office. I hope Nancy Pelosi stays on our radar since she definitely reveals herself to be an active, viable member of this cabal.
view the rest of the comments →
ReadThatAlready ago
Ah, I see the issue immediately "A significant reason for the surge is the shortage of girls created by sex selection abortions, particularly in Asia, but now infiltrating the Asian cultures in the U.S. according to the Boston Globe. It is widely acknowledged that legalized prostitution exacerbates the problem." What they are saying is that in Asia because so many girls have been aborted because of the one child policy of China and Indian culture preferring male children over females there are FAR more males than females in Asia and this is becoming true in America too because of immigration and because women are whores. This is creating a shortage of suitable women and an increase of men who need sexual partners. This is the EXACT scenario the MGTOWs and TFLers in America have reported and which Christians PREDICTED many years ago would be the natural result of abortion and the sexual revolution. HAREM CULTURE. To meet the need then more and more girls are being SHARED through pornographic and general sex work exploitation, wife sharing/swapping, etc. and so that is FURTHER exacerbating the problem as more and more women are being taken off the marriage market as nobody will NOR WILL BE ALLOWED TO marry these women as they are OWED by corporations/pimps. This is INSANELY profitable for criminals/corportions/government(through sex work taxation), but DEVASTATING for society as girls are ALL becoming slaves and men no longer have women to marry. The effect is causing the POPULATION GROWTH TO FALL TO NEGATIVE ZERO. Which is of course what BILL GATES STATED WAS THE PLAN. I predicted this scenario years ago and said that the next stage will be that Asians will flood into Western countries looking for wives and will TAKE THEM BY FORCE if not stopped and war will ensue either way as this means a WAR FOR RESOURCES. That is HUMAN RESOURCES. War for vagina and the right to REPRODUCE. which is the MEANS OF PRODUCTION that the Marxists were really after all along. GENOCIDE. Deny your enemy the ability to reproduce and continue to reproduce yourself and you win the FUTURE. And so here we are. The exact scenario that Sanger wanted us in. A battle over REPRODUCTION TO FORCE A NEW RACE TO EMERGE. This class struggle/race struggle will not be fought over money, but rather over the RIGHT OF REPRODUCTION based SOLELY ON PHYSICAL PROWESS and INTELLIGENCE and not economics just as Sanger wanted. The Fabians admitted they planned this to result in the destruction of capitalism and the return to animal instinct which Darwin said would ensure the survival of the species. See chapter 3 in Origin of the Species. The man was a human hating PSYCHOPATH. A genocidal maniac. In other words they are FORCING us to fight like animals for women for their amusement as a sick experiment to see what will emerge because they believe that whatever it is will be the best mankind can hope for and in the mean time they will make a fortune selling pornography, massages, tricks, lap dances, etc. and forced abortions and birth control administered as early as possible and sterilizing vaccines (see Texas law and Bill Gates foundation) paid through Obamacare tax to make sure the women are not out of commission too long so the money keeps flowing and the population continues to decrease to a level our overlords can manage and easily control and if that fails they'll start another world war and wipe out hundred of millions to make whatever adjustment they feel necessary as they have done twice before and as they did in Vietnam destroying an entire generation of conservative men in America. This is why they want to "remove the stigma" of sex work. Check out Bree Olsen's statements on the subject. She's part of this. They need more sex workers and in a hurry.
Gone20 ago
Wack jobs like you are why a lot of people aren't taking pizzagate seriously.
ReadThatAlready ago
Go check out Sandman and StarDusk videos on youtube and tell me this wasn't the plan from the outset. They were PREPPING us for this. A war of REPRODUCTION. That is what the left wing of the MGTOW movement is all about hence artificial wombs and surrogates and sex tourism and mail order brides and sex robots. It's all a part of this. quantokitty stumbled upon it, but I've been covering it for YEARS as has the entire manosphere. We knew about this years ago.
ThePuppetShow ago
How about just looking at the actual population split.
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-gender-age.php
ReadThatAlready ago
Again I call you a LIAR. The total CURRENT POPULATION IS NOT ABLE TO REPRODUCE. Women lose FERTILITY AT THE AGE OF 36. WOMEN LIVE LONGER THAN MEN THEREFORE. THE POPULATION OF WOMEN MUST EXCEED THE POPULATION OF MEN TO MAINTAIN THE POPULATION AT CURRENT LEVELS. The one child policy was instituted in 1979. SINCE THEN THE FEMALE BIRTH RATE HAS PLUMMETED. I supplied MANY ARTICLES IN THIS THREAD PROVING THAT. It's over government shill. You've been EXPOSED. Your plan to FORCE US TO FIGHT OVER WOMEN HAS BEEN EXPOSED. IT'S OVER. Got that?
HashTagFU ago
I got one for ya : I think you're right and I don't care. Said all of that without raising my voice (figuratively) even once. Give it a try. Mebbe people will listen to you more. I doubt it but mebbe.
ThePuppetShow ago
<yawn> It may have plummeted in China and India where the popluations double any other country, but not everywhere. You've gone full lunatic at this point so there's no reason to discuss this anymore. Let's get back to Nancy Pelosi and crew trying to normalize the sex slave industry.
ReadThatAlready ago
It doesn't have to plummet everywhere. The china deficit of women alone is larger than the entire population of Canada of both sexes COMBINED. That means all the Chinese men currently of fighting age would need to destroy Canada and rape all the women to even meet 25% of their demand for females and that's being generous with the numbers. India makes the matter even worse. The atheists are taught that the greatest motivator is THE SEX DRIVE. They are gearing UP FOR WAR and raising a horny army REWARDING SOLDIERS WITH SEX. The Clinton foundation already does this. Don't you remember? hashtag give us back our girls? Those guys were PAID IN CHILD BRIDES. This is what Clinton does. It's part of how she raises armies. We're on to it.
ThePuppetShow ago
My point, China and India may have the problem you speak of, the world doesn't. They can't invade Canada, the world would destroy them for it. Not to mention their gender split is only a 2% difference.
You sound like globalist Bill Gates arguing over populatuon. It's absurd.
ReadThatAlready ago
Actually I'm arguing against Bill Gates. I'm saying he is trying to kill off people one way or another because what they did fucked up the gender balance and they know it and that was the plan so they could implement a war using sex a motivator and then reduce the world's population even more.
ThePuppetShow ago
You claim there needs to be more males than females. In reality, most species that reproducie are at a 1:1 ratio. Someone filled you head with the bullshit that there has to be more females than males. You quoted some evolution mumbo jumbo earlier, I'm suprised you don't know this. Look up Fishers principle.