J Scott Cunningham makes a reference to a "paramour show" on September 4th and several references to "good times in Fl Pines". Websters defines paramour as, "a person with whom someone is having a romantic or sexual relationship and especially a secret or improper relationship". I would suggest looking into related crimes in that area.
That must have been quite a show if he's still squealing about it in September within the context of a mobile money transfer service involving a suspected sex trafficker. Especially after his "Guggenheim experience" and "good times in Fl. Pines". If there wasn't already so much innuendo and "coincidence" surrounding these societal blights I might be able to let it slide. There are only so many double entendres that one can take before it becomes obvious what's going on. It stops being plausible when every comment becomes layered in innuendo and hyper-meaning. After awhile one begins to develop a sense for this sort of thing. Contrary to popular belief, the majority of convictions are based solely upon circumstantial evidence if for no other reason than that this type of evidence is more commonly encountered at crime scenes than direct evidence. The more likely scenario is that his comment was directed at the chain rather than a circus performance several months prior.
view the rest of the comments →
thestormking ago
J Scott Cunningham makes a reference to a "paramour show" on September 4th and several references to "good times in Fl Pines". Websters defines paramour as, "a person with whom someone is having a romantic or sexual relationship and especially a secret or improper relationship". I would suggest looking into related crimes in that area.
Lunari ago
There was a Cirque du Soleil show called "Paramour" that was at a theater in DC in June
Link
thestormking ago
That must have been quite a show if he's still squealing about it in September within the context of a mobile money transfer service involving a suspected sex trafficker. Especially after his "Guggenheim experience" and "good times in Fl. Pines". If there wasn't already so much innuendo and "coincidence" surrounding these societal blights I might be able to let it slide. There are only so many double entendres that one can take before it becomes obvious what's going on. It stops being plausible when every comment becomes layered in innuendo and hyper-meaning. After awhile one begins to develop a sense for this sort of thing. Contrary to popular belief, the majority of convictions are based solely upon circumstantial evidence if for no other reason than that this type of evidence is more commonly encountered at crime scenes than direct evidence. The more likely scenario is that his comment was directed at the chain rather than a circus performance several months prior.
TrotskyTrotsky ago
So if you look at the transaction that says the times in FL Pines there is one comment to it. its alefantis saying "im worth more"
So he's being paid for something that involves his effort