I haven't actually seen the warrant, but I did see the complaint to unseal it.
The complaint, itself, admits that the warrant was issued in the case involving Hillary Clinton's emails.
That is probable cause, especially when you consider that they actually found Hillary Clinton's emails.
The rest might have been a surprise, but given that Trump was tweeting about it two years ago suggests that everyone had every reason in the world to serve that man with a warrant.
To be clear, that lawyer's complaint already expressly states that the probable cause was the suspicion that Anthony Weiner had possession of Hillary Clinton emails.
That suspicion was further founded when they found Hillary Clinton emails.
Could you correct me please, if I understand all that correctly?
Classified material was found on Clinton's private server. Which is against the law. But the FBI under Comey does nothing with all kinds of shady excuses, while many other people are destryoed and thrown into jail for minor breaches.
Ok.
But then some or all of these emails are discovered on even another private computer! So they were spread.
And now the FBI under Comey argues, because the FBI already knew about these emails, that this was no problem?!
The FBI officially stated that there was no prosecutor who would prosecute, alluding to the fact that they were all "in bed together."
They then released, via the FBI Vault, other investigations that shows the corruption has been going on for a long time.
The FBI only investigates. They don't prosecute. So, while they can know all of the bad things that go on, they are powerless to do anything about it, if Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Peter Kadzik, etc are still in charge.
I do not agree. If the FBI publicly says, that they believe they catched a criminal, then the prosecutors have no excuse not to prosecute and come under pressure.
But if the FBI itself says nothing to see here, then they take away any pressure on the prosecutors and help with the cover up.
They didn't say, "nothing to see here." That is mostly the media putting words into Comey's mouth.
The actual letter explains that classified information was mishandled, but that no prosecutor was going to do anything about it.
Later, the investigation was reopened, based on what was found on Anthony Weiner's laptop, at which point Peter Kadzik was put in charge of the investigation, making the FBI come to the same conclusion.
Everything else is the media's injected narrative that doesn't really exist.
I'm not saying the FBI are the good guys. I'm saying it is not their job to prosecute and pressure needs to be put on the DOJ because of things like Fast and Furious. Organized crime has infiltrated the DoJ. Probably the FBI, too, but the DoJ are the ones holding up justice.
view the rest of the comments →
webofslime ago
I haven't actually seen the warrant, but I did see the complaint to unseal it.
The complaint, itself, admits that the warrant was issued in the case involving Hillary Clinton's emails.
That is probable cause, especially when you consider that they actually found Hillary Clinton's emails.
The rest might have been a surprise, but given that Trump was tweeting about it two years ago suggests that everyone had every reason in the world to serve that man with a warrant.
To be clear, that lawyer's complaint already expressly states that the probable cause was the suspicion that Anthony Weiner had possession of Hillary Clinton emails.
That suspicion was further founded when they found Hillary Clinton emails.
micha_ ago
Could you correct me please, if I understand all that correctly?
Classified material was found on Clinton's private server. Which is against the law. But the FBI under Comey does nothing with all kinds of shady excuses, while many other people are destryoed and thrown into jail for minor breaches. Ok.
But then some or all of these emails are discovered on even another private computer! So they were spread.
And now the FBI under Comey argues, because the FBI already knew about these emails, that this was no problem?!
Is that correct?
webofslime ago
The FBI officially stated that there was no prosecutor who would prosecute, alluding to the fact that they were all "in bed together."
They then released, via the FBI Vault, other investigations that shows the corruption has been going on for a long time.
The FBI only investigates. They don't prosecute. So, while they can know all of the bad things that go on, they are powerless to do anything about it, if Loretta Lynch, Eric Holder, Peter Kadzik, etc are still in charge.
micha_ ago
I do not agree. If the FBI publicly says, that they believe they catched a criminal, then the prosecutors have no excuse not to prosecute and come under pressure. But if the FBI itself says nothing to see here, then they take away any pressure on the prosecutors and help with the cover up.
webofslime ago
They didn't say, "nothing to see here." That is mostly the media putting words into Comey's mouth.
The actual letter explains that classified information was mishandled, but that no prosecutor was going to do anything about it.
Later, the investigation was reopened, based on what was found on Anthony Weiner's laptop, at which point Peter Kadzik was put in charge of the investigation, making the FBI come to the same conclusion.
Everything else is the media's injected narrative that doesn't really exist.
I'm not saying the FBI are the good guys. I'm saying it is not their job to prosecute and pressure needs to be put on the DOJ because of things like Fast and Furious. Organized crime has infiltrated the DoJ. Probably the FBI, too, but the DoJ are the ones holding up justice.