I understand claims need references, and the investigation needs to be kept on track
But surely the Weiner/Huma/Clinton emails cut right to the heart of it all, and are very likely our best chance to get some concrete evidence, or indeed to show we were wrong all along....as such the legal wranglings over them are hugely important and may well make or break any chance of justice
Now, why on earth would anyone interested in pizzagate want to bury a conversation about them? This stuff pretty much is pizzagate
provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
Why don't you try to find a different topic to discuss that you are interested in. Since you seem to have an ulterior motive to suppress it. Thank you for demonstrating that this topic is on to something that the pedofiles want to suppress. Good job!
You do seem to spam that one single thing and constantly try to talk down to people rather than calmly and efficiently explain exactly what steps someone could take to make their post better. You're fake and gay.
I have read all of your posts. I also see that you cut and paste the same thing in different threads repeatedly. I suggest you find a thread that you support instead of trying to delete possible new avenues of research. You are really aggressive and hostile and you don't seem interested in investigating. Rather you are trying to get threads deleted.
This sub is bloated with off-topic posts and posts that don't follow the outlined, easy-to-follow structure (rules) meant to make this sub readable and worthwhile. Posts related to similar topics belong in similar subs, not this very specific sub that is dedicated to a singular issue and furthering public knowledge solely on that topic. I would like to ask everyone to please move your posting on a broader range of topics to the relevant subs.
My goal is to trim the fat so that we can keep current on the sub's topic without devoting entirely too much time to trudging through the swamp of posts that belong elsewhere.
I had help writing this from a friend who is disconnected from this so that I could not come off as angry.
Thank you for pointing this out to me I will try to improve my responses in the future to be less aggressive and more improvement oriented rather than exclusionary.
How does a lawyer's reaction to an FBI warrant have anything to do with pizzagate, besides the fact that Weiner's laptop is the source of some pizzagate material?
Does the fact that this laywer was "appalled" somehow further the investigation? Does the obviously predictable fact that some lawyer somewhere would find an issue with some side of some thing merit discussion or attention where the pizzagate investigation is concerned?
Basically, some idiot reporter that couldn't get a better story asked a lawyer to give him one.
/golfclap
If everything even tangentially related to pizzagate, like where Weiner went to eat last night because of his laptop, we'll never see the end of the bullshit posts that do absolutely nothing for this subverse.
This is current news that is directly related to wieners case. It also helps bring awareness and Public outrage to demand accountability. Knowing both sides of the story and all opposing opinions are tremendously important to investigating leads. Part of the reason that pedofile sex rings flourish is a lack of awareness and complacency from the public. I also find it telling when there is a lot of opposition about certain subjects from shills and trolls. Demands for deletion are definitely a heads up from shills to investigators that this might be a hot lead. There is no need to delete threads just let them slide off. In fact only the pedo protectors want censorship and definitely trying to keep the public Distracted, ignorant, so that the judges and law enforcement can do what they always have done: COVER UP the crimes of the pedofile elite sex ring.
@gopluckyourself is doing a great job alerting the mods to offending posts. Demands for deletion are from the active investigators of this sub to keep the clutter to a minimum.
The rest of your post seems as if you think this submission is somehow mainly supposed to reach people that don't already know about PG. Since this is a PG subverse, that entire narrative is laughable.
The username you referred to has not contributing anything others than requests for deletions. Has not provided one useful thread. His posts are copy and paste of the same exact thing. You are acting hostile and demeaning which seems typical of shills. No offense intended. I hope you are just uninformed but study the franklin cover up and you will see that deletion equals cover up. Only the pedo protectors benefit from controlling discussion and investigation.
The username you referred to has not contributing anything others than requests for deletions.
And he's done it well. I've not seen him ask for any deletions that weren't against the rules.
Has not provided one useful thread.
Lots of useful comments alerting us to offending submissions.
His posts are copy and paste of the same exact thing.
Not a lot of creativity needs to go into rule-violation alerts.
You are acting hostile and demeaning which seems typical of shills.
You're losing credibility with me, as I've not been even remotely hostile. It looks as though you've just come from rEddit, so I really suggest you grow a thicker skin. Voaters don't mince words like the people where you're from.
No offense intended.
You really should lurk around outside of PG here.
I hope you are just uninformed but study the franklin cover up and you will see that deletion equals cover up.
I'm not here to study anything. An article specifically about a lawyer whining about a warrant is not useful to this investigation.
Only the pedo protectors benefit from controlling discussion and investigation.
You're sounding more and more like you're trying to COINTEL this. I'd stop while you're ahead.
Only pedo-protectors benefit from useless garbage posts like this to help slide the forum. Period.
Are you a moderator? Not sure your motivations but you are labeling me in a rather negative light. Again that seems hostile and aggressive. You can ask me if I come from Reddit. Rather than accuse me see one is a hostile approach the other is trying to understand.
Reddit censors and deletes which is what you are supporting.
Do you come from Reddit? Are you a moderator? Why are you so invested in defending that other username, or is that your alt? See I don't need to accuse you or get hostile, I hope that you can clear this up, I am very interested to learn where you are coming from.
Not sure your motivations but you are labeling me in a rather negative light.
... Do you remember when you said this?
You are acting hostile and demeaning which seems typical of shills.
And I'm acting like a shill?
Again that seems hostile and aggressive. You can ask me if I come from Reddit. Rather than accuse me see one is a hostile approach the other is trying to understand.
So extrapolating from incomplete data is "hostile" to you. This website is not the place for you, apparently.
Reddit censors and deletes which is what you are supporting. Do you come from Reddit?
I delete crap that violates the rules. Your second sentence... kek. As if someone like me could post there and not get banned immediately.
Why are you so invested in defending that other username, or is that your alt?
Because this subverse, and the people trying to help keep it useful, are constantly under attack by intellectually inferior idiots like you.
And why are you so invested in defending this submission? Did you submit it, or was that your alt?
See I don't need to accuse you or get hostile,
You could use a bit of thought put into your responses.
I hope that you can clear this up, I am very interested to learn where you are coming from.
You asked something twice here, and it'd be entirely too easy for you to figure out the answer yourself... beyond too easy.
Because of that, I really don't care much where you're coming from, as you've shown nothing but your inability to comment on any subject whatsoever as anything more than a shit-stirring moron.
Lol, I am here to help in whatever way I can for these poor kids. You can see my post history and I stand by that. I might not be able to help much but I try to contribute if I can. I have a right to my opinion and so do you. Useless threads should be slid. No question about. Deleting a thread simply because you don't agree with the content is dangerous water. Instead contribute content that gets upvoated. But who am I to suggest that? I don't need anyone telling me what is applicable to pizzagate I can judge for my self. Everyone here should be trying to help contribute. This thread is full of shills and you have not hurt my feelings at all, it's all good no sweat. my focus Is the children. Hopefully we share a common goal. This whole chat has been odd. If you find that other username useful, with his requests for deletion with out simply asking the op delete and repost and explain the rules. Then that is your opinion, but it seems very Reddit like to me and unlike the rules posted on the sticky. No need to reply thanks for the odd chat. Hopefully we share some common ground: the children.
Lol, I am here to help in whatever way I can for these poor kids.
Easy enough to say.
You can see my post history and I stand by that.
A whole 13 days. Wow, nobody would ever think to hide behind less than 2 weeks of lies.
Useless threads should be slid.
Idiot. It's the useless threads that slide the useful ones, not the other way around.
Deleting a thread simply because you don't agree with the content is dangerous water.
It violates the rules. Period. A lawyer's bitch-fit has nothing to do with the PG investigation.
Instead contribute content that gets upvoated. But who am I to suggest that?
No, and you're nobody.
I don't need anyone telling me what is applicable to pizzagate I can judge for my self.
Apparently, you cannot.
Everyone here should be trying to help contribute.
And by defending shitposts, you're not.
This thread is full of shills and you have not hurt my feelings at all, it's all good no sweat. my focus Is the children.
I bet it is.
Hopefully we share a common goal.
Not if you defend shitposts that have nothing to do with pizzagate being posted here.
This whole chat has been odd. If you find that other username useful, with his requests for deletion with out simply asking the op delete and repost and explain the rules.
Rules should not have to be explained. They're pretty much eli5 material.
Then that is your opinion, but it seems very Reddit like to me and unlike the rules posted on the sticky.
You don't really have a good grasp of what it means to be reddit-like, because you have every hallmark of having been swimming in that shithole until very recently. You don't get to comment as if you know about that place what others, who have been gone from there for many months, know.
No need to reply thanks for the odd chat. Hopefully we share some common ground: the children.
Maybe, but I'm certain that my interests in them are not the same as yours, since you appear to be defending the sliding of legitimate investigative posts.
sorry I'm used to arguing with the op about this I didn't even realize you weren't lol.
basically this doesn't provide an explanation as to how it furthers the investigation in either the title or the body paragraph. It's an opinion piece about a lawyer that's mad that something made hillary look bad. Who gives a shit about that? There's no new info. It's barely tangentially related to pizza gate. The post doesn't ask any questions that could lead to more discoveries being made.
view the rest of the comments →
gopluckyourself ago
MOOOOOOODDDDS /u/kingkongwaswrong [O] /u/Melitica [J] /u/Crensch [O] /u/numbchuck [J] /u/KnowThyself [M] /u/heygeorge [D] /u/VictorSteinerDavion [O] /u/Phobos_Mothership [M] /u/Millennial_Falcon [M] /u/RedGreenAlliance [J]3. EVERY new discussion post needs to cite at least one source and provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
madhatter67 ago
I understand claims need references, and the investigation needs to be kept on track
But surely the Weiner/Huma/Clinton emails cut right to the heart of it all, and are very likely our best chance to get some concrete evidence, or indeed to show we were wrong all along....as such the legal wranglings over them are hugely important and may well make or break any chance of justice
Now, why on earth would anyone interested in pizzagate want to bury a conversation about them? This stuff pretty much is pizzagate
2impendingdoom ago
why? this is a relevant post. We want to see CF emails.
gopluckyourself ago
provide an explanation as to why you believe it is relevant or furthers the investigation. 7. Where the title is not sufficient to explain the connections/content of a link, the body must explain the connection.
2impendingdoom ago
the title mentions weiner's laptop.
gopluckyourself ago
ok and? tie me in I also can say weiner's laptop it doesn't make it relevant.
2impendingdoom ago
Weiner is married to Hillary Clinton's top aide
gopluckyourself ago
yeah and??? how is this helping us further the investigation. Read the sidebar rules. You're violating several of them.
Forgetmenot ago
Why don't you try to find a different topic to discuss that you are interested in. Since you seem to have an ulterior motive to suppress it. Thank you for demonstrating that this topic is on to something that the pedofiles want to suppress. Good job!
gopluckyourself ago
read all of my arguments then come back and say the same thing.
Wolftrail7272 ago
You do seem to spam that one single thing and constantly try to talk down to people rather than calmly and efficiently explain exactly what steps someone could take to make their post better. You're fake and gay.
Forgetmenot ago
I have read all of your posts. I also see that you cut and paste the same thing in different threads repeatedly. I suggest you find a thread that you support instead of trying to delete possible new avenues of research. You are really aggressive and hostile and you don't seem interested in investigating. Rather you are trying to get threads deleted.
gopluckyourself ago
This sub is bloated with off-topic posts and posts that don't follow the outlined, easy-to-follow structure (rules) meant to make this sub readable and worthwhile. Posts related to similar topics belong in similar subs, not this very specific sub that is dedicated to a singular issue and furthering public knowledge solely on that topic. I would like to ask everyone to please move your posting on a broader range of topics to the relevant subs. My goal is to trim the fat so that we can keep current on the sub's topic without devoting entirely too much time to trudging through the swamp of posts that belong elsewhere.
I had help writing this from a friend who is disconnected from this so that I could not come off as angry.
Thank you for pointing this out to me I will try to improve my responses in the future to be less aggressive and more improvement oriented rather than exclusionary.
2impendingdoom ago
this is not my post, but I'm not seeing how it violated the rules. What rule am I violating?
Crensch ago
@gopluckyourself @Forgetmenot
How does a lawyer's reaction to an FBI warrant have anything to do with pizzagate, besides the fact that Weiner's laptop is the source of some pizzagate material?
Does the fact that this laywer was "appalled" somehow further the investigation? Does the obviously predictable fact that some lawyer somewhere would find an issue with some side of some thing merit discussion or attention where the pizzagate investigation is concerned?
Basically, some idiot reporter that couldn't get a better story asked a lawyer to give him one.
/golfclap
If everything even tangentially related to pizzagate, like where Weiner went to eat last night because of his laptop, we'll never see the end of the bullshit posts that do absolutely nothing for this subverse.
@anonymousgate
Forgetmenot ago
This is current news that is directly related to wieners case. It also helps bring awareness and Public outrage to demand accountability. Knowing both sides of the story and all opposing opinions are tremendously important to investigating leads. Part of the reason that pedofile sex rings flourish is a lack of awareness and complacency from the public. I also find it telling when there is a lot of opposition about certain subjects from shills and trolls. Demands for deletion are definitely a heads up from shills to investigators that this might be a hot lead. There is no need to delete threads just let them slide off. In fact only the pedo protectors want censorship and definitely trying to keep the public Distracted, ignorant, so that the judges and law enforcement can do what they always have done: COVER UP the crimes of the pedofile elite sex ring.
Crensch ago
@gopluckyourself is doing a great job alerting the mods to offending posts. Demands for deletion are from the active investigators of this sub to keep the clutter to a minimum.
The rest of your post seems as if you think this submission is somehow mainly supposed to reach people that don't already know about PG. Since this is a PG subverse, that entire narrative is laughable.
Forgetmenot ago
The username you referred to has not contributing anything others than requests for deletions. Has not provided one useful thread. His posts are copy and paste of the same exact thing. You are acting hostile and demeaning which seems typical of shills. No offense intended. I hope you are just uninformed but study the franklin cover up and you will see that deletion equals cover up. Only the pedo protectors benefit from controlling discussion and investigation.
Crensch ago
And he's done it well. I've not seen him ask for any deletions that weren't against the rules.
Lots of useful comments alerting us to offending submissions.
Not a lot of creativity needs to go into rule-violation alerts.
You're losing credibility with me, as I've not been even remotely hostile. It looks as though you've just come from rEddit, so I really suggest you grow a thicker skin. Voaters don't mince words like the people where you're from.
You really should lurk around outside of PG here.
I'm not here to study anything. An article specifically about a lawyer whining about a warrant is not useful to this investigation.
You're sounding more and more like you're trying to COINTEL this. I'd stop while you're ahead.
Only pedo-protectors benefit from useless garbage posts like this to help slide the forum. Period.
Forgetmenot ago
Are you a moderator? Not sure your motivations but you are labeling me in a rather negative light. Again that seems hostile and aggressive. You can ask me if I come from Reddit. Rather than accuse me see one is a hostile approach the other is trying to understand. Reddit censors and deletes which is what you are supporting. Do you come from Reddit? Are you a moderator? Why are you so invested in defending that other username, or is that your alt? See I don't need to accuse you or get hostile, I hope that you can clear this up, I am very interested to learn where you are coming from.
Crensch ago
... Do you remember when you said this?
And I'm acting like a shill?
So extrapolating from incomplete data is "hostile" to you. This website is not the place for you, apparently.
I delete crap that violates the rules. Your second sentence... kek. As if someone like me could post there and not get banned immediately.
Because this subverse, and the people trying to help keep it useful, are constantly under attack by intellectually inferior idiots like you.
And why are you so invested in defending this submission? Did you submit it, or was that your alt?
You could use a bit of thought put into your responses.
You asked something twice here, and it'd be entirely too easy for you to figure out the answer yourself... beyond too easy.
Because of that, I really don't care much where you're coming from, as you've shown nothing but your inability to comment on any subject whatsoever as anything more than a shit-stirring moron.
Forgetmenot ago
Lol, I am here to help in whatever way I can for these poor kids. You can see my post history and I stand by that. I might not be able to help much but I try to contribute if I can. I have a right to my opinion and so do you. Useless threads should be slid. No question about. Deleting a thread simply because you don't agree with the content is dangerous water. Instead contribute content that gets upvoated. But who am I to suggest that? I don't need anyone telling me what is applicable to pizzagate I can judge for my self. Everyone here should be trying to help contribute. This thread is full of shills and you have not hurt my feelings at all, it's all good no sweat. my focus Is the children. Hopefully we share a common goal. This whole chat has been odd. If you find that other username useful, with his requests for deletion with out simply asking the op delete and repost and explain the rules. Then that is your opinion, but it seems very Reddit like to me and unlike the rules posted on the sticky. No need to reply thanks for the odd chat. Hopefully we share some common ground: the children.
Crensch ago
Easy enough to say.
A whole 13 days. Wow, nobody would ever think to hide behind less than 2 weeks of lies.
Idiot. It's the useless threads that slide the useful ones, not the other way around.
It violates the rules. Period. A lawyer's bitch-fit has nothing to do with the PG investigation.
No, and you're nobody.
Apparently, you cannot.
And by defending shitposts, you're not.
I bet it is.
Not if you defend shitposts that have nothing to do with pizzagate being posted here.
Rules should not have to be explained. They're pretty much eli5 material.
You don't really have a good grasp of what it means to be reddit-like, because you have every hallmark of having been swimming in that shithole until very recently. You don't get to comment as if you know about that place what others, who have been gone from there for many months, know.
Maybe, but I'm certain that my interests in them are not the same as yours, since you appear to be defending the sliding of legitimate investigative posts.
gopluckyourself ago
sorry I'm used to arguing with the op about this I didn't even realize you weren't lol.
basically this doesn't provide an explanation as to how it furthers the investigation in either the title or the body paragraph. It's an opinion piece about a lawyer that's mad that something made hillary look bad. Who gives a shit about that? There's no new info. It's barely tangentially related to pizza gate. The post doesn't ask any questions that could lead to more discoveries being made.
2impendingdoom ago
if the judge is creating grounds for Obama to preemptively pardon HRC, we are all going to go out and riot.
gopluckyourself ago
yeahhh less on the otriaye talk we'll cross that bridge if it happens