LOL. So Eric Braverman contacts journalist Ron Furnier and tells him "to 'follow the money' and find the real HRC scandal" then disappears. Anyone with an IQ above 80 could connect the dots but not you! Fascinating. To quote Neera Tanden: "Holy Smokes"......https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/25357
I do. You do know that all this Braverman is missing nonsense really strarted moving after a fake news article says he turned himself into the Russian embassy.
Ahhh no. Much to your chagrin this whole thing started with a John Podesta email to Neera Tanden not with "fake news". And that only came up because Eric Braverman RESIGNED from the Clinton Foundation. What's next, you telling me Eric Braverman never resigned and is really just on an extended coffee break? lol
An email from 2015. And then...................................................what?
Eric Braverman resigns from the Clinton Foundation. Jan 2015.
Politico writes about him leaving
Ron Fournier writes an article with someone saying follow the money. He also says the source has no evidence of wrongdoing.
Podesta speculates Braverman is the source.
And?
It's now Dec 2016. There's no evidence Braverman is missing, but a bunch of clowns wrote up some stuff that he was handing himself over to Russian embassy. What happened during all of 2015 and most of 2016? Do you think the wikileaked email makes him go into hiding? It's ridiculous.
What he thought no one would suspect he was the source? And that bubble was popped by the wikileaked email? Yeah, he resigned and then he took another high profile gig teaching at Yale. If you want to claim he's laying low that is far different from saying he is missing.
"laying low is far different from saying he is missing."....First it was 2 Straw Men. Now you're "Moving the Goal Posts". You're either a shill or an idiot. Which is it?
I'm not sure you know what moving the goalposts means.
Nobody's reported Braverman missing.
Podesta and his colleague guess at two other possible choices for source because they felt Braverman didn't fit the description in article.
Braverman being the Witness Protection program is one of the stupidest theories of this brouhaha.
view the rest of the comments →
AreWeSure ago
wow. that is ridiculous.
Um, the timing makes no sense because he married his husband long after he quit the Clinton Foundation.
DarkMath ago
AreWeSure, have you watched any of the "Where is Eric Braverman" videos yet? https://www.youtube.com/user/georgwebb/videos
AreWeSure ago
I don't need to because he is not missing
And he also favorably re-tweeted the Hillary twitter account twice this year.
DarkMath ago
"he is not missing".....Yes he is. :-) https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1508133
AreWeSure ago
Yeah, No.
DarkMath ago
LOL. So Eric Braverman contacts journalist Ron Furnier and tells him "to 'follow the money' and find the real HRC scandal" then disappears. Anyone with an IQ above 80 could connect the dots but not you! Fascinating. To quote Neera Tanden: "Holy Smokes"......https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/emailid/25357
AreWeSure ago
That's some LOOOOOOOONG ASS dots to connect.
So journalist is told in early 2015. Late 2016 fake news website says Braverman Defects! The Hunt Begins!
Confirmation Bias is a powerful drug.
DarkMath ago
And here come the Straw Men. "Defects"? You know what a Straw Man is right?
AreWeSure ago
I do. You do know that all this Braverman is missing nonsense really strarted moving after a fake news article says he turned himself into the Russian embassy.
So I'm not using Straw Man.
DarkMath ago
Ahhh no. Much to your chagrin this whole thing started with a John Podesta email to Neera Tanden not with "fake news". And that only came up because Eric Braverman RESIGNED from the Clinton Foundation. What's next, you telling me Eric Braverman never resigned and is really just on an extended coffee break? lol
AreWeSure ago
An email from 2015. And then...................................................what?
Eric Braverman resigns from the Clinton Foundation. Jan 2015. Politico writes about him leaving Ron Fournier writes an article with someone saying follow the money. He also says the source has no evidence of wrongdoing. Podesta speculates Braverman is the source.
And?
It's now Dec 2016. There's no evidence Braverman is missing, but a bunch of clowns wrote up some stuff that he was handing himself over to Russian embassy. What happened during all of 2015 and most of 2016? Do you think the wikileaked email makes him go into hiding? It's ridiculous.
What he thought no one would suspect he was the source? And that bubble was popped by the wikileaked email? Yeah, he resigned and then he took another high profile gig teaching at Yale. If you want to claim he's laying low that is far different from saying he is missing.
DarkMath ago
"laying low is far different from saying he is missing."....First it was 2 Straw Men. Now you're "Moving the Goal Posts". You're either a shill or an idiot. Which is it?
AreWeSure ago
I'm not sure you know what moving the goalposts means.
Nobody's reported Braverman missing.
Podesta and his colleague guess at two other possible choices for source because they felt Braverman didn't fit the description in article.
Braverman being the Witness Protection program is one of the stupidest theories of this brouhaha.
DarkMath ago
I'm going with idiot. ;-)