You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

lawfag123 ago

Just the black van alone was not enough to convince me, but when you add the human trafficking elements, the suppression of the idea that it was human trafficking, and the last-minute involvement of the US attorney's office from Virginia getting involved...it looks remarkably strange.

Who owns the black van? Who called the neighbor and what did he say to convince him to stop saying human trafficking?

crystalclearme ago

exactly... if people don't see it then move on along and those of us who see it crystal clear can continue. If it isn't there it will work itself out.

lawfag123 ago

I understand where you're coming from. I feel a little upset about it because it appears that these people have been getting way with it for so long without any intervention from the media or law-enforcement.

It's also important, however, to recognize that it's going to be very hard to "prove" anything by looking at articles and records on the Internet. we are only going to be able to put enough evidence together to raise the issue.

I'm not a hacker and I'm not going to be able to crack the password to comet ping pong to prove that their company is trading child porn. Short of that, I try to hold myself to a high standard of thought. We can't say for sure what anything "is" ( i.e. so-and-so is a child molester). We can only say what things look like. I hope other people adopt this attitude. I always upvote micha because he or she looks at things with a critical eye first, and an open mind second. We should all strive to do both.

crystalclearme ago

Yes we definitely have a great deal of limitations in this investigation we can agree on that. We also agree we aren't the ones who are going to be able to prove anything and need true investigation. I think you and I basically agree. I do. And I agree there is a place for what you are advocating and I think it is a good idea and needed. Also would probably agree some of us have other info or experience and skills to use this info that is not necessarily present in this thread. That is part of why I feel this is a strong lead and want it investigated and not dismissed so early or quickly. Make sense? I think we are largely in agreement

lawfag123 ago

Makes sense. Agreed!