You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

oresd ago

So there was a van a the scene of a house in ARIZONA. These black vans are rather common. Most hotels have them. As do many companies.

So all the way in Arizona an inference is drawn because of a van the Podesta clan may own?

I am having trouble seeing the connection here. If the only connection is that there are 2 similar vans, then this is not substantive.

What am I missing?

Possible ago

To my eyes, perhaps the important part of the story is the apparent cover up taking place. If some new evidence came to light my opinion might change though.