Remember, this is what the entire media did to make McMartin go away: gaslight anyone who looked at the evidence and was suspicious. But when the tunnels were found, nothing changed. Recent books ignore the tunnels being discovered 26 years ago.
http://www.whale.to/b/stickel.html
The best proof we have so far of the larger version of Pizzagate theory is the media's complicit stonewalling and the push for global censorship based on one guy shooting a computer. So this Guardian article is yet more proof something nefarious and massive is afoot.
McMartin was a hysteria started by a single parent who made wild accusations who also happened to be a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic and died from complications of chronic alcoholism. Pizzagate is not hysteria.
Strange then that a tunnel complex exactly as described by all the child witnesses was dug up there in 1990. Equally strange that some were diagnosed with blunt force trauma to their privates and some even had chlamydia.
The tunnels weren't "dug up". They were detected via radar that E. Gary Stickel used. People actually investigated and found they were waste tunnels that had been dug decades earlier, and further confirmed that the only objects they could find from the last 25 years were near the edge of the concrete slab floor that completely covered them, rendering them inaccessible to anyone but rodents. McMartin was hysteria just like Kern County was hysteria as were others. It's funny to me that some here are willing to believe government agents are corrupt and untrustworthy with regards to pizzagate but won't apply the same attitude to the law enforcement who imprisoned innocent people in the 80s. That's a real double standard you got there.
As for saying the kids had chlamydia, do you have actual evidence for that? I studied the McMartin case and never saw anything about that.
Your source, W. Joseph Wyatt, is a psychologist and 'expert' in child sexual abuse of the kind who sprung up after McMartin. I know more about archaeology than he does.
His 'analysis' is just trying to justify the modern approach of assuming ritual abuse allegations are made up.
My source consists of five PhD experts in digging and discovering things willing to put their names on a report. Yours is a self-interested so-called expert on child sex abuse who wants very much to say nothing happened at the McMartin school.
As for blocking me, that's what I expect from people who can't argue the facts.
view the rest of the comments →
B_dog ago
Remember, this is what the entire media did to make McMartin go away: gaslight anyone who looked at the evidence and was suspicious. But when the tunnels were found, nothing changed. Recent books ignore the tunnels being discovered 26 years ago. http://www.whale.to/b/stickel.html
The best proof we have so far of the larger version of Pizzagate theory is the media's complicit stonewalling and the push for global censorship based on one guy shooting a computer. So this Guardian article is yet more proof something nefarious and massive is afoot.
madmanpg ago
McMartin was a hysteria started by a single parent who made wild accusations who also happened to be a diagnosed paranoid schizophrenic and died from complications of chronic alcoholism. Pizzagate is not hysteria.
paulf ago
Strange then that a tunnel complex exactly as described by all the child witnesses was dug up there in 1990. Equally strange that some were diagnosed with blunt force trauma to their privates and some even had chlamydia.
McMartin was not hysteria.
madmanpg ago
The tunnels weren't "dug up". They were detected via radar that E. Gary Stickel used. People actually investigated and found they were waste tunnels that had been dug decades earlier, and further confirmed that the only objects they could find from the last 25 years were near the edge of the concrete slab floor that completely covered them, rendering them inaccessible to anyone but rodents. McMartin was hysteria just like Kern County was hysteria as were others. It's funny to me that some here are willing to believe government agents are corrupt and untrustworthy with regards to pizzagate but won't apply the same attitude to the law enforcement who imprisoned innocent people in the 80s. That's a real double standard you got there.
As for saying the kids had chlamydia, do you have actual evidence for that? I studied the McMartin case and never saw anything about that.
http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/bsi/article/viewFile/77/96
B_dog ago
Your source, W. Joseph Wyatt, is a psychologist and 'expert' in child sexual abuse of the kind who sprung up after McMartin. I know more about archaeology than he does.
His 'analysis' is just trying to justify the modern approach of assuming ritual abuse allegations are made up.
Your source is part of the problem.
madmanpg ago
Your source is no more accredited or reliable. I'm blocking you since you're being hostile in this.
B_dog ago
My source consists of five PhD experts in digging and discovering things willing to put their names on a report. Yours is a self-interested so-called expert on child sex abuse who wants very much to say nothing happened at the McMartin school.
As for blocking me, that's what I expect from people who can't argue the facts.