Finally a "Debunking" article that addresses things. (pizzagate)

submitted ago by shootermcgvn

From the MSM, but they actually address a lot of evidence put forth.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html?_r=1

They get the timeline completely wrong, skirt past a couple issues like the "handkerchief," but some of it at least gave some decent answers that are rational enough to actually "debunk" claims.

I'm still wondering why Podesta has creepy CP paintings and stuffed animals in his house.

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AdVict0riam ago

This actually a good thing. It shows that their efforts to sway public opinion by just yelling "FAAAAAAKE" over and over have utterly failed, and now they actually have to address some of the real issues and evidence.

shootermcgvn ago

My thoughts exactly.

I don't like how they completely ignored the handkerchief email, but at least they posted the fucking thing so people can see it.

atheist4thecause ago

They did mention the handkerchief in the connections at the top at least. I don't have the time to read it all right now, but a skim over and it looks like it's at least addressing information (legitimately or not). Thanks for the post!