From the MSM, but they actually address a lot of evidence put forth.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html?_r=1
They get the timeline completely wrong, skirt past a couple issues like the "handkerchief," but some of it at least gave some decent answers that are rational enough to actually "debunk" claims.
I'm still wondering why Podesta has creepy CP paintings and stuffed animals in his house.
jonnythaiwongy9 ago
They're upping their propaganda game definitely, that list of questions going round should put this to bed. NYT can skim thru already debunked wild speculation from idiots all it wants, they can answer none of the hard questions.
Thakiddds ago
Main point of article - military style weapon.
shootermcgvn ago
I'm getting downvoted. This is what we want, people. Actual answers. The moment we get some all of a sudden anyone bringing it up is a shill? It's like the_donald all over again in here.
AdVict0riam ago
This actually a good thing. It shows that their efforts to sway public opinion by just yelling "FAAAAAAKE" over and over have utterly failed, and now they actually have to address some of the real issues and evidence.
shootermcgvn ago
My thoughts exactly.
I don't like how they completely ignored the handkerchief email, but at least they posted the fucking thing so people can see it.
atheist4thecause ago
They did mention the handkerchief in the connections at the top at least. I don't have the time to read it all right now, but a skim over and it looks like it's at least addressing information (legitimately or not). Thanks for the post!
Orange_Circle ago
do they cover Spirit Cooking and Podesta's pedophiles art?