You are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

AlphaOmega ago

It is intersting to see how the MSM is framing it. I know Pizzagate well, I've seen the evidence. I still can't say I'm certain one way or the other about anyhing.

What I can say, though, is that the media is absolutely lying about what's been uncovered. They are absolutely, unequivocally, misrepresenting us. They build up these colorful straw man then just set them on fire and piss all over us and make us seem like we're insane.

Trouble is, I know I'm not crazy. I'm just a normal, very well educated dude with a family.

Watching the MSM behave this way,, more than anything else I've seen, is the scariest thing about Pizzagate so far....and THAT is saying something.

Atatarkus ago

Couldnt agree more im in the same boat, university educated, gamefully employed not some paranoid loner. For a long time ive been aware that a small group of self intetested people have been shaping the world socially and economicallly to suit their agendas but i never subscribed to the idea of an organised new world order i always thought that was a bit paranoid and that if it seemed like it was the case it was probably because a lot of the time elite interests overlap.

After seeing this im not so sure. Ive been keeping my eye on this for over a month now and the actions of the media coupled with the massive amount of connections investigated between the elites and the clintons have made this all seem like im watching the nwo operate in real time. Symbols disappearing from websites, websites taken down, twitter censored, facebook censored, reddit censored etc. its not just mainstream news that are whitewashing this.

Its enough to give you nightmares

Blacksmith21 ago

"Gainfully" not "gamefully" ; )

Atatarkus ago

Thanks for the correction i hope the mistake didnt make the post a damp squid (i know its squib in case u didnt get the reference)

Blacksmith21 ago

The problem is when arguing with the blue pilled, is that you can spit out 10 document facts in an argument, and 1 slightly off detail, and the whole narrative will shift to the minor inaccuracy.

Atatarkus ago

Youre right and its much nicer to be corrected anonymously online than in a room full of people so thanks again.

On that point though isnt it a blessing that james alefantis is such a fucking clown that he decided to post those creepy pictures. Its hard for people to argue with you when you're holding a picture of a toddler taped to table in their face.

Blacksmith21 ago

LOL....public shaming is my hallmark ; ) No offense meant.

I'll be honest, the photo of the little girl taped to the table would never have turned my head, if it weren't for the other IG pics. In fact, most of them, as stand alone, wouldn't be all that bad. Or all that bad without the comments. Context is everything.

Atatarkus ago

None taken. Again youre right on its on own it wouldnt be that bad but there is plenty of context and ive found when atop my soapbox that people are most responsive to that picture in particular so i tend to use that as one of my go to arguments. My redpilling attempts go as follows: 1. Brief explanation of how pizzagate started 2. Show alefantis IG pics (emphasis on aforementioned) 3. Show the wikileaks email about the 3 kids in the pool. 4. (And most importantly because it shows confidence and certainty ) urge the person to read about it for themselves. Works a treat!

Blacksmith21 ago

For me, it was the Podesta/McCann e-fits that sealed the deal.