My main message to you all would be that it is fine to believe and say this but leave it at 'something is shady' until you have the proportional amount of evidence to make the very heavy and serous claim of pedophilia. Can we all agree that we do not condone the death threats that alefantis, and I'm sure others, are getting daily? And I understand that you are not responsible for the death threats and for that guy going into the pizzeria with a gun, but that guy was online reading what everyone was writing and basing his actions off of that.
Look through this thread and ask yourself if it sounds like people are simply suspicious of alefantis and haven't made up their mind or do people seem sure of themselves? And what is this based on? Do you really believe you've made the appropriate accusation based on the appropriate evidence?
One thing I have been asking pizzagate people is this (and it's important so think about it!): Is pizzagate falsifiable? What evidence could be shown that could exonerate those being insinuated as pedophiles?
Of course it is falsifiable. All they needed to do was to explain all the evidence, and how come it was ALL just a coincidence, and how it had been wrongly interpreted. So far, Alefantis explained a couple of the instagram pictures and that's it. But when you look at ALL the connections and events and organisations and places and people that ALL happen to relate to child trafficking or paedophilia in some way, it becomes a statistical improbability that is pretty much indistinguishable from impossibility that these connections all relate to paedophilia only by chance and coincidence, and not because they are actually all connected through paedophilic activity.
Don't you recognise that if these people had come out and addressed the concerns, and given a reasonable, coherent and innocent explanation for everything, then this investigation wouldn't have gone further, that it would have died down? There can only be one reason why no such explanation has been offered, and that's because there isn't one.
You're being incredibly blind and suffering from massive cognitive dissonance. Which is understandable, because it's so horrific. I wonder if you have really looked at all the evidence that's been found, or if you've just scraped the surface with Comet ping pong and the instagram pictures. Those things are really not much compared to what else has been discovered. I suggest you go check it out, because you'll feel really awful and guilty in the end, about trying to defend these people when you hadn't really looked into it properly.
I'd like to respond to you a little more in depth but in the mean time look at this it is a video of alefantis talking to two protestors outside comet. He's explaining the picture of the girl with her hands taped to the table, then look down at the comments. Now consider this: nothing will ever be enough. There will never be an explanation good enough. The answers given will always be turned against the accused, and once you have submitted yourself to the mob you are at their mercy.
If the presstitutes -- and Alefantis -- were trying to get the truth out, they would deal with the evidence directly, instead of using straw men.
An argument has not been defeated until it has been refuted in its strongest form. And that is plainly what Big Media is very, VERY energetically NOT doing. So you need to ask yourself why that would be. Megyn's tears are obviously fake, or she would address the strongest form of our "argument".
Every time they avoid the meat and focus on the parsley and the wilted lettuce AGAIN, it wakes more people up. It's annoying to watch the fakery, but the red-pilling is, on net, a gain.
view the rest of the comments →
JUNOAK ago
My main message to you all would be that it is fine to believe and say this but leave it at 'something is shady' until you have the proportional amount of evidence to make the very heavy and serous claim of pedophilia. Can we all agree that we do not condone the death threats that alefantis, and I'm sure others, are getting daily? And I understand that you are not responsible for the death threats and for that guy going into the pizzeria with a gun, but that guy was online reading what everyone was writing and basing his actions off of that.
Look through this thread and ask yourself if it sounds like people are simply suspicious of alefantis and haven't made up their mind or do people seem sure of themselves? And what is this based on? Do you really believe you've made the appropriate accusation based on the appropriate evidence?
One thing I have been asking pizzagate people is this (and it's important so think about it!): Is pizzagate falsifiable? What evidence could be shown that could exonerate those being insinuated as pedophiles?
SpikyAube ago
Of course it is falsifiable. All they needed to do was to explain all the evidence, and how come it was ALL just a coincidence, and how it had been wrongly interpreted. So far, Alefantis explained a couple of the instagram pictures and that's it. But when you look at ALL the connections and events and organisations and places and people that ALL happen to relate to child trafficking or paedophilia in some way, it becomes a statistical improbability that is pretty much indistinguishable from impossibility that these connections all relate to paedophilia only by chance and coincidence, and not because they are actually all connected through paedophilic activity.
Don't you recognise that if these people had come out and addressed the concerns, and given a reasonable, coherent and innocent explanation for everything, then this investigation wouldn't have gone further, that it would have died down? There can only be one reason why no such explanation has been offered, and that's because there isn't one.
You're being incredibly blind and suffering from massive cognitive dissonance. Which is understandable, because it's so horrific. I wonder if you have really looked at all the evidence that's been found, or if you've just scraped the surface with Comet ping pong and the instagram pictures. Those things are really not much compared to what else has been discovered. I suggest you go check it out, because you'll feel really awful and guilty in the end, about trying to defend these people when you hadn't really looked into it properly.
JUNOAK ago
I'd like to respond to you a little more in depth but in the mean time look at this it is a video of alefantis talking to two protestors outside comet. He's explaining the picture of the girl with her hands taped to the table, then look down at the comments. Now consider this: nothing will ever be enough. There will never be an explanation good enough. The answers given will always be turned against the accused, and once you have submitted yourself to the mob you are at their mercy.
Do you believe the response given in the video?
ZalesMcMuffin ago
If the presstitutes -- and Alefantis -- were trying to get the truth out, they would deal with the evidence directly, instead of using straw men.
An argument has not been defeated until it has been refuted in its strongest form. And that is plainly what Big Media is very, VERY energetically NOT doing. So you need to ask yourself why that would be. Megyn's tears are obviously fake, or she would address the strongest form of our "argument".
Every time they avoid the meat and focus on the parsley and the wilted lettuce AGAIN, it wakes more people up. It's annoying to watch the fakery, but the red-pilling is, on net, a gain.