It's impossible to prove with a 100% certainty that Assange is alive. Even seeing him for real won't allow to rule out it wasn't a doppelganger or he hasn't been brainwashed. It's a question of how difficult it is to fake the evidence. Faking a video interview is orders of magnitude more difficult and costly than an audio interview that is downright trivial to fake. It's also orders of magnitude more risky as there are so many elements that can be checked as compared to audio.
What we aee saying is that audio is so easy to fake that discussing about this piece of evidence isn't even worth the time and attention because it doesn't increase significantly our confidence that Assange is alive.
view the rest of the comments →
e-traiu ago
We cant take a film of him as proof of life either.
They can CGI Assange .
They own Hollywood. They propably have mad special effect skills and resources.
How the fuck can we accept any proof without getting proof from credicle source, or actually seeing him f2f 😧
standalone ago
It's impossible to prove with a 100% certainty that Assange is alive. Even seeing him for real won't allow to rule out it wasn't a doppelganger or he hasn't been brainwashed. It's a question of how difficult it is to fake the evidence. Faking a video interview is orders of magnitude more difficult and costly than an audio interview that is downright trivial to fake. It's also orders of magnitude more risky as there are so many elements that can be checked as compared to audio.
What we aee saying is that audio is so easy to fake that discussing about this piece of evidence isn't even worth the time and attention because it doesn't increase significantly our confidence that Assange is alive.