[David Brock blasts Brooklyn, ‘animals’ in press](Funny that Brock claims an "association" between the Crisis Actor "Welch" and the life-time Actor "Jones" to "prove" that people who look at evidence are "domestic terrorists" ) http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/david-brock-trump-clinton-media-232562 - These folks are relatively busted, so when are they going to figure out their situation and either go into hiding or at least stop making ridiculous public proclamations, which just call attention to themselves?
I think Brock is highly compromised. I've not seen anyone pursue this angle, but he had been blackmailed by a previous boyfriend, and this has been documented. I don't have time to find the article right now. Why did he switch sides from being vehemently anti-Clinton to be such an advocate today? It was a radical change. I think for the same reason that his previous lover had the goods on him for blackmail.
Brock changed sides because he has no real political opinion. Iread his book. He was snubbed by Republican elite for being gay. I have no reason to question that.
After what we have learned, do you not think that the Clintons threatened him to join their side or else...because he was pretty good as a hatchet man? I know his cover story was the gay thing, but I wonder, given all of his connections to this at every level (including active CTR here), if he is personally right in the middle of it too.
view the rest of the comments →
samhara ago
[David Brock blasts Brooklyn, ‘animals’ in press](Funny that Brock claims an "association" between the Crisis Actor "Welch" and the life-time Actor "Jones" to "prove" that people who look at evidence are "domestic terrorists" ) http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/david-brock-trump-clinton-media-232562 - These folks are relatively busted, so when are they going to figure out their situation and either go into hiding or at least stop making ridiculous public proclamations, which just call attention to themselves?
reasonedandinformed ago
I think Brock is highly compromised. I've not seen anyone pursue this angle, but he had been blackmailed by a previous boyfriend, and this has been documented. I don't have time to find the article right now. Why did he switch sides from being vehemently anti-Clinton to be such an advocate today? It was a radical change. I think for the same reason that his previous lover had the goods on him for blackmail.
samhara ago
Brock changed sides because he has no real political opinion. Iread his book. He was snubbed by Republican elite for being gay. I have no reason to question that.
Brock works for money or power. I explained my point of view on that subject here : https://pearlchanter.wordpress.com/2016/12/07/pizzagate-reply-to-auticulture-post This article is about the perps, the abused , the abusive society and social reactions of different factions of the population to the pizza Pedophile information.. Also goes into the logical arguments around the data and why the assumption of cild abuse is logical. https://auticulture.wordpress.com/2016/12/10/vicious-circles-angry-squares-part-three-abuse-culture/
reasonedandinformed ago
After what we have learned, do you not think that the Clintons threatened him to join their side or else...because he was pretty good as a hatchet man? I know his cover story was the gay thing, but I wonder, given all of his connections to this at every level (including active CTR here), if he is personally right in the middle of it too.