If pizzagate is real, it's unlikely that there's any up-side to this interview with regards to getting at the truth. There's a reason people made a stink about Hillary Clinton getting debate questions in advance. Knowing what you're going to be asked in advance gives you a huge advantage. And even if we were to assume for a moment that Megyn Kelly will not give Alefantis the questions in advance herself (though she probably will), anyone following this forum or the relevant hashtags on twitter (like Alefantis, Brock, people working for/with them) will already know all the evidence that he might be presented with and questions he might be asked, which means he will have the opportunity to prepare plausible-sounding answers.
This is a big part of the problem with the fact that the public is having to investigate this themselves when the investigative journalists and the authorities should be the ones doing it. The fact that all of this investigation has been done right out in the open where anyone can see it means that an interview like the one Kelly is going to do is essentially useless. If Alefantis and company are guilty of something, there's no way they're going to be surprised by or unprepared to answer any question directed at them, since it's highly unlikely Megyn Kelly has done any original research into this that goes deeper than what has been done here. On the other hand, if Alefantis and company are innocent of everything other than bad taste and a twisted sense of humor, the mere fact he's had an opportunity to prepare plausible answers for any potentially hard questions or seemingly damning evidence will automatically call the legitimacy of his responses into question.
[EDIT: Furthermore, for the many uncritical thinkers out there, this will count for them as the MSM investigating and debunking pizzagate, which will be a blow to the real legitimate core of the pizzagate investigation, which is to raise enough awareness and interest in the subject to get a real investigation by people who have the tools and authority to truly settle this question one way or the other. Though even that is problematic, because on this particular subject matter we have ample historical evidence to suggest that these kinds of investigations are often mishandled when they involve the elites.]
I think more appropriate hashtags for this interview would be: #NoUpSide #CantGetAtTheTruthThisWay #MSMHasFailedThePeople #MSMComplacencyIsTheRealReasonForPizzagate
view the rest of the comments →
heks_ ago
If pizzagate is real, it's unlikely that there's any up-side to this interview with regards to getting at the truth. There's a reason people made a stink about Hillary Clinton getting debate questions in advance. Knowing what you're going to be asked in advance gives you a huge advantage. And even if we were to assume for a moment that Megyn Kelly will not give Alefantis the questions in advance herself (though she probably will), anyone following this forum or the relevant hashtags on twitter (like Alefantis, Brock, people working for/with them) will already know all the evidence that he might be presented with and questions he might be asked, which means he will have the opportunity to prepare plausible-sounding answers.
This is a big part of the problem with the fact that the public is having to investigate this themselves when the investigative journalists and the authorities should be the ones doing it. The fact that all of this investigation has been done right out in the open where anyone can see it means that an interview like the one Kelly is going to do is essentially useless. If Alefantis and company are guilty of something, there's no way they're going to be surprised by or unprepared to answer any question directed at them, since it's highly unlikely Megyn Kelly has done any original research into this that goes deeper than what has been done here. On the other hand, if Alefantis and company are innocent of everything other than bad taste and a twisted sense of humor, the mere fact he's had an opportunity to prepare plausible answers for any potentially hard questions or seemingly damning evidence will automatically call the legitimacy of his responses into question.
[EDIT: Furthermore, for the many uncritical thinkers out there, this will count for them as the MSM investigating and debunking pizzagate, which will be a blow to the real legitimate core of the pizzagate investigation, which is to raise enough awareness and interest in the subject to get a real investigation by people who have the tools and authority to truly settle this question one way or the other. Though even that is problematic, because on this particular subject matter we have ample historical evidence to suggest that these kinds of investigations are often mishandled when they involve the elites.]
I think more appropriate hashtags for this interview would be: #NoUpSide #CantGetAtTheTruthThisWay #MSMHasFailedThePeople #MSMComplacencyIsTheRealReasonForPizzagate